Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/288,887

DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Priority
Oct 30, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0151360
Examiner
BALAOING, ARIEL A
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
602 granted / 757 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
89.2%
+49.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 757 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4,17,18,20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KIM (US 2015/0229117). Regarding claim 1, KIM discloses a display panel (abstract) comprising: a substrate comprising a first display area and a second display area, and a non-display area outside the first and second display areas (Figure 9, 11; display area corresponding to pixel blocks PB); a first mesh line in the first display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the first display area (Figure 9, 11; mesh lines corresponding to any HPSVL of a pixel block); a second mesh line HPSVL in the second display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the second display area (Figure 9, 11; mesh lines corresponding to any HPSVL of a pixel block); a first high power transmission line PSL in the non-display area, electrically connected to the first mesh line, and configured to transmit a first high power voltage to the first mesh line (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; power transmission line corresponding to any PSL of a pixel block); and a second high power transmission line [high power supply lines] in the non-display area, electrically connected to the second mesh line, and configured to transmit a second high power voltage to the second mesh line (Figure 9, 11; Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; power transmission line corresponding to any PSL of a pixel block). Regarding claim 2, see the rejections of the parent claim concerning the subject matter this claim is dependent upon. KIM further discloses wherein the first mesh line and the second mesh line are electrically insulated from each other (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; electrical insulation of some form would be inherently required to prevent circuit short). Regarding claim 3, see the rejections of the parent claim concerning the subject matter this claim is dependent upon. KIM further discloses wherein the first high power transmission line and the second high power transmission line are electrically insulated from each other (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; electrical insulation of some form would be inherently required to prevent circuit short). Regarding claim 4, see the rejections of the parent claim concerning the subject matter this claim is dependent upon. KIM further discloses wherein the first high power transmission line extends in a first direction, and wherein the second high power transmission line extends in the first direction, and is spaced apart from the first high power transmission line in a second direction crossing the first direction (Figure 9, 11). Regarding claim 17, KIM discloses a display device (abstract) comprising: a display panel comprising a first display area and a second display area, and a non-display area outside the first and second display areas (Figure 9, 11); and a panel driver configured to drive the display panel based on input image data, and to provide high power voltages to the first and second display areas, respectively (Figure 8; paragraph 111-114, 117-120), wherein the display panel comprises: a first mesh line in the first display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the first display area (Figure 9, 11); a second mesh line in the second display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the second display area (Figure 9, 11); a first high power transmission line in the non-display area, electrically connected to the first mesh line, and configured to transmit a first high power voltage to the first mesh line (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120); and a second high power transmission line in the non-display area, electrically connected to the second mesh line, and configured to transmit a second high power voltage to the second mesh line (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120). Regarding claim 18, see the rejections of the parent claim concerning the subject matter this claim is dependent upon. KIM further discloses wherein the panel driver is configured to divide the input image data into region image data for the first and second display areas, and wherein the panel driver is configured to determine a target voltage level of the high power voltages respectively corresponding the first and second display areas by analyzing a corresponding one of the region image data (paragraph 7-10). Regarding claim 20, KIM discloses an electronic device (abstract) comprising: a display panel accommodated in an internal space between a housing and a window (paragraph 5; window and housing enclosing display electronics are generic components to consumer display devices and are not given patentable weight effecting the inventive concept), and comprising a first display area and a second display area, and a non- display area outside the first and second display areas (Figure 9, 11); and a panel driver configured to drive the display panel based on input image data, and to provide high power voltages to the first and second display areas (Figure 8; paragraph 111-114, 117-120), respectively, wherein the display panel comprises: a first mesh line in the first display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the first display area (Figure 9, 11; mesh lines corresponding to any HPSVL of a pixel block); a second mesh line HPSVL in the second display area, and electrically connected to pixels in the second display area (Figure 9, 11; mesh lines corresponding to any HPSVL of a pixel block); a first high power transmission line PSL in the non-display area, electrically connected to the first mesh line, and configured to transmit a first high power voltage to the first mesh line (Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; power transmission line corresponding to any PSL of a pixel block); and a second high power transmission line [high power supply lines] in the non-display area, electrically connected to the second mesh line, and configured to transmit a second high power voltage to the second mesh line (Figure 9, 11; Figure 9, 11; paragraph 111-114, 117-120; power transmission line corresponding to any PSL of a pixel block). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KIM (US 2015/0229117) in view of CHEN (US 2018/0174535). Regarding claim 19, see the rejections of the parent claim concerning the subject matter this claim is dependent upon. However, KIM does not expressly disclose wherein the panel driver is configured to calculate an average gray level of gray levels represented by pixel data comprised in the corresponding one of the region image data, and wherein the panel driver is configured to determine the target voltage level of a corresponding one of the high power voltages based on the average gray level. In a similar field of endeavor, CHEN discloses wherein the panel driver is configured to calculate an average gray level of gray levels represented by pixel data comprised in the corresponding one of the region image data, and wherein the panel driver is configured to determine the target voltage level of a corresponding one of the high power voltages based on the average gray level (Figure 11; paragraph 96). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify KIM to include the teachings of CHEN, since CHEN states that such a modification would improve image hue of a display. Furthermore, as both inventions are analogous, such a modification would provide additional driving means based on those disclosed by CHEN. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior Art fails to disclose further comprising: first connection lines extending in the second direction, and connecting the first high power transmission line and the first mesh line; and second connection lines extending in the second direction, and connecting the second high power transmission line and the second mesh line. Although various prior art discloses power lines in various directions (see BANG (US 2022/0173197)), prior art fails to disclose arrangement in view of mesh lines including defined display areas as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARIEL A BALAOING whose telephone number is (571)272-7317. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-4AM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at (571) 270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARIEL A BALAOING/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676934
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675172
MOUSE DEVICE, MOUSE FOOT, AND BATCH MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MOUSE FEET REPLACEMENT ASSEMBLY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12650799
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND IMAGING SYSTEM
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12625568
MOUSE BUTTON STRUCTURE AND MOUSE DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12613666
METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR INFORMATION DISPLAY
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 9m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 757 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month