Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/305,867

ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS AND FLEXIBLE DIRECT-CURRENT POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Priority
Mar 14, 2023 — CN 202310243743.0 +1 more
Examiner
LY, XUAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
460 granted / 540 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
564
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 540 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/21/2025 the submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 8-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being participated by Guo et al. (CN113595057). Regarding claim 1, Guo teaches An energy storage apparatus (see figures 1-11 and par. [n0043-n0044] and [n0048-n0078]), characterized in that the energy storage apparatus is connected between a positive direct-current bus (see figure 1 on top positive bus) and a negative direct-current bus (see figure 1 on bottom negative bus) of a receiving-end converter of a flexible direct-current power transmission system (see figure 1 and par. [n0048]; a direct current side controllable energy storage device for flexible direct current system, the device applied to the flexible direct current transmission system, connected in parallel between the transmitting end converter station and the receiving end converter station) and comprises an energy storage battery (fig. 2@ energy storage submodule B1), wherein the energy storage battery charges and/or discharges at a first power during normal operation of the flexible direct-current power transmission system (par. [n0043] and [n0076]; during steady-state operation, peak clipping and valley filling are performed by means of charging and discharging of an energy storage device to stabilize fluctuations in renewable energy output (i.e. the energy storage battery performing charging and/or discharging at a first power during normal operation of the flexible direct-current power transmission system)), and the energy storage battery charges and/or discharges at a second power when a transmission fault occurs at the receiving-end converter and results in surplus power in the flexible direct-current power transmission system (par. [n0044] and [n0077]; when a fault occurs in a receiving-end alternating-current system, surplus power is absorbed by means of the energy storage device, thereby effectively suppressing a direct-current overvoltage (i.e. the energy storage battery performing charging and/or discharging at a second power when an outgoing fault occurs in the receiving-end converter and results in a surplus power of the flexible direct-current power transmission system)), wherein the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]; when a fault occurs in the receiving-end alternating-current system, surplus power occurs and a direct-current voltage rises; and by reducing the number of active submodules, a current flows into the storage device, placing the storage device in a charging state. That is to say, when a fault occurs in the receiving-end alternating-current system, the power that was supposed to be used for the receiving-end alternating-current system is used to charge the energy storage device, and in this case, it is common general knowledge in the art that the charging power of the energy storage device is greater than charging power during normal working condition). Regarding claim 8, Guo teaches wherein the energy storage apparatus (see figures 1-2) comprises a plurality of energy storage modules (fig. 1@ several serially connected sub-modules SM) connected in series between the positive direct-current bus (see figure 1 on top positive bus) and the negative direct-current bus (see figure 1 on bottom negative bus), a first lead terminal of a first energy storage module (SM) is connected to the positive direct-current bus (see figure 1), a first lead terminal of each remaining energy storage module is connected to a second lead terminal of a preceding energy storage module (see figure 1), a second lead terminal of a last energy storage module (SM) is connected to the negative direct-current bus (see figure 1), and each energy storage module comprises the energy storage battery (fig. 2@ B1) and a switch circuit (fig. 2@ S1 and S2), wherein the switch circuit (S1 and S2) is for connecting the energy storage battery (B1) between a first lead terminal and a second lead terminal within a same energy storage module in a first state, and short-circuiting a first lead terminal and a second lead terminal within a same energy storage module in a second state (see par. [n0061-n0067]). Regarding claim 9, Guo teaches wherein the switch circuit (S1, S2) comprises a first switch module (S1) and a second switch module (S2), wherein a first connection terminal of the first switch module (S1) is connected to a positive electrode of the energy storage battery (B1), a second connection terminal of the first switch module (S1) is connected to a first connection terminal of the second switch module (S2), a second connection terminal of the second switch module (S2) is connected to a negative electrode of the energy storage battery (B1), the first lead terminal is connected between the second connection terminal of the first switch module (see figure 2) and the first connection terminal of the second switch module (S2), and the second lead terminal is connected between the second connection terminal of the second switch module (S2) and the negative electrode of the energy storage battery (B1), (see figure 2). Regarding claim 10, Guo teaches wherein the first switch module (S1) comprises a first IGBT (fig. 2@ IGBT1) and a first diode (fig. 2@ VD1), the first connection terminal and the second connection terminal of the first switch module (S1) correspond to a collector and an emitter of the first IGBT (IGBT1) respectively, a negative electrode of the first diode (VD1) is connected to the first connection terminal of the first switch module (S1), and a positive electrode of the first diode (VD1) is connected to the second connection terminal of the first switch module (S1); and the second switch module (S2) comprises a second IGBT (fig. 2@ IGBT2) and a second diode (fig. 2@ VD2), the first connection terminal and the second connection terminal of the second switch module (S2) correspond to a collector and an emitter of the second IGBT (IGBT2) respectively, a negative electrode of the second diode (VD2) is connected to the first connection terminal of the second switch module (S2), and a positive electrode of the second diode is connected to the second connection terminal of the second switch module (see figure 2). Regarding claim 11, Guo teaches wherein each energy storage module (SM) further comprises a buffer circuit (fig. 2@ capacitor C1), and the buffer circuit (C1) is configured to filter current within the energy storage module (SM). Regarding claim 12, Guo teaches wherein the energy storage apparatus comprises a smoothing reactor (fig. 1@ inductor) connected in series with the plurality of energy storage modules (SM), (see figure 1). Regarding claim 13, Guo teaches A flexible direct-current power transmission system, wherein the flexible direct- current power transmission system comprises the energy storage apparatus (see figures 1-11 and par. [n0048-n0078]; a direct-current-side controllable energy storage device for a flexible direct-current system) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guo et al. (CN113595057) in view of Qiao (US 2021/0197690). Regarding claim 2, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]; when a fault occurs in the receiving-end alternating-current system, surplus power occurs and a direct-current voltage rises; and by reducing the number of active submodules, a current flows into the storage device, placing the storage device in a charging state. That is to say, when a fault occurs in the receiving-end alternating-current system, the power that was supposed to be used for the receiving-end alternating-current system is used to charge the energy storage device, and in this case, it is common general knowledge in the art that the charging power of the energy storage device is greater than charging power during normal working condition), except for wherein the first power is less than or equal to a rated power of the energy storage battery, and the second power is greater than the rated power of the energy storage battery. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to the first power is less than or equal to a rated power of the energy storage battery, and the second power is greater than the rated power of the energy storage battery, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having the first power is less than or equal to a rated power of the energy storage battery, and the second power is greater than the rated power of the energy storage battery in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Regarding claim 3, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]), except for wherein the second power is not less than 5 times the first power, and the second power is not greater than 7 times the first power. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to the second power is not less than 5 times the first power, and the second power is not greater than 7 times the first power, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having the second power is not less than 5 times the first power, and the second power is not greater than 7 times the first power in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Regarding claim 4, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]), except for wherein discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 1 minute. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 1 minute, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 1 minute in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Regarding claim 5, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]), except for wherein the discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 2 hours. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to the discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 2 hours, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having the discharge duration in which the energy storage battery discharges at the first power is not less than 2 hours in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Regarding claim 6, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]), except for wherein when a sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not less than 200 milliseconds. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to when a sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not less than 200 milliseconds, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having when a sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not less than 200 milliseconds in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Regarding claim 7, Guo teaches the second power is greater than the first power (par. [n0077]), except for wherein when the sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, the charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not greater than 500 milliseconds. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to when the sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, the charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not greater than 500 milliseconds, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Further, Qiao teaches a discharge rated power and a charge rated power; and obtaining rated powers of the battery and a current actual power of the battery; and adjusting the actual power according to a difference between the rated powers and the current actual power when the current actual power is greater than or equal to the rated powers (see Abstract; par. [0006] and [0040-0049]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Guo with the teachings of Qiao by having when the sending-end converter of the flexible direct-current power transmission system is capable of performing voltage regulation in response to the transmission fault, the charge duration in which the energy storage battery charges at the second power is not greater than 500 milliseconds in order to allow the battery to act efficiently during normal conditions while outputting short, powerful bursts when critical demand spikes. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUAN LY whose telephone number is (571)272-9885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUAN LY/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /REXFORD N BARNIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683397
Method for Operating a Network Management System for a Local Energy Network Depending on a Storage Strategy of an Energy Store
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671312
CAPACITOR VOLTAGE BALANCING CONTROL TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-LEVEL MULTI-CHANNEL DRIVES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671258
PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND CHARGING EQUIPMENT
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658710
BASE STATION POWER CONVERTER SUITABLE FOR SINGLE-PHASE POWER SOURCES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647038
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 7m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 540 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month