Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/357,517

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE INTEGRATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Examiner
ALI, JAHED
Art Unit
3699
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Truist Bank
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
85 granted / 141 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +60% interview lift
Without
With
+59.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 141 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This is a first office action on the merits, in response to the claims filed on October 14, 2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-20 have been examined. Claim Objections Claim 1 objected to because of the following informalities. For example, independent claim 1 recites, a computing system. Furthermore, dependent claims recite, for example, claim 2 recites, [t]he computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1. The language, “[t]he computing system for application programming interface integration” is not consistent with the independent claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of Mueller et al. (US 12475441 B2, hereinafter, “Patent Document”). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-20 of the instant application are anticipated by patent claims 1-20 of the Patent Document. See chart below: Instant Application Patent Document For ease of comprehension, below contains only relevant and redacted claim language from the Patent Document. Claim 1: A computing system, comprising: a memory; one or more processors in communication with the memory; and program instructions executable by the one or more processors via the memory to: receive at a hypertext document of a first digital platform of a financial institution, one or more inputs to link to a digital program of a digital wallet service provider; access, via a network, an application programming interface (API) that communicatively integrates a first server of the first digital platform of the financial institution with a second server of the digital program of the digital wallet service provider; perform a cross-platform communication event incorporating a push-pull process that enables the first server to (a) push new information to the second server and (b) pull additional information associated with query parameters from the second server, the cross-platform communication event facilitating frequent data exchanges and real-time data processing using an internet protocol (IP) WebSocket connection between the financial institution and the digital wallet service provider that is continuously open; integrate the first digital platform of the financial institution with a second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider by incorporating an inline frame of another hypertext document of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider within the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; provide, via a user interface of a user device, a digital display of the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider, the providing facilitating data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider; receive, via the user interface, the data entry, wherein the data entry includes authentication of the user to access the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider; trigger, upon the data entry being successful, a redirection from the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider to the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; display, via the user interface, the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; and receive a request to associate a bank account of the financial institution with a digital wallet of the digital wallet service provider and based thereon, connect the bank account to the digital wallet. Claim 1: A computing system for application programming interface integration, the computing system comprising: a memory; one or more processors in communication with the memory; and program instructions executable by the one or more processors via the memory to: receive, via a user interface of a user device, one or more inputs to link to a digital program of a digital wallet service provider identified from the one or more inputs, the one or more inputs being received at a hypertext document of a first digital platform of a financial institution, access, via a network, the API that communicatively integrates the first server of the first digital platform of the financial institution with the second server of the digital program of the digital wallet service provider; a cross-platform communication event via an application programming interface (API) with the digital program of the digital wallet service provider, the cross-platform communication event including a push-pull process that enables a first server of the first digital platform to automatically and instantly push new information to a second server of the digital program of the digital wallet service provider as soon as the new information is received and the first server pulling additional information associated with query parameters from the second server; perform the cross-platform communication event to minimize server load through frequent data exchanges and real-time data processing using an internet protocol (IP) WebSocket connection between the financial institution and the digital wallet service provider that is continuously open rather than waiting for a webpage of the digital wallet service provider to open; integrate the first digital platform of the financial institution with a second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider by incorporating an inline frame of another hypertext document of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider within the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; automatically provide, via the user interface, a digital display of the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider, the providing facilitating data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider; receive, via the user interface, the data entry, wherein the data entry includes authentication of the user to access the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider; in response to determining that the data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider is successful, trigger a redirection from the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider to the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; display, via the user interface, the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution; and receive a request to associate a bank account of the financial institution with a digital wallet of the digital wallet service provider and based thereon, connect the bank account to the digital wallet such that the bank account is usable to make purchases via the digital wallet. Claim 2: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution includes an external payment gateway, the external payment gateway may be displayed via a payment gateway aggregator. Claim 2: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution includes an external payment gateway, the external payment gateway may be displayed via a payment gateway aggregator. Claim 3: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the one or more inputs include user authentication information necessary to access the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 3: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the one or more inputs include user authentication information necessary to access the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 4: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the user authentication information includes an email address of the user that is associated with the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 4: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the user authentication information includes an email address of the user that is associated with the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 5: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the cross-platform communication event including generating the digital display of the digital program of the digital wallet service provider, the digital display including a graphical embedded element comprising user customization characteristics. Claim 5: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the cross-platform communication event including generating the digital display of the digital program of the digital wallet service provider, the digital display including a graphical embedded element comprising user customization characteristics. Claim 6: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 5, wherein the data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider includes a selection of the graphical embedded element, wherein the graphical embedded element includes an actionable element to add payment account information of the user pulled from the first digital platform of the financial institution to the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 6: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 5, wherein the data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider includes a selection of the graphical embedded element, wherein the graphical embedded element includes an actionable element to add payment account information of the user pulled from the first digital platform of the financial institution to the digital program of the digital wallet service provider. Claim 7: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the providing the digital display includes overlaying, via a website overlay, the digital program of the digital wallet service provider on top of the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution. Claim 7: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the providing the digital display includes overlaying, via a website overlay, the digital program of the digital wallet service provider on top of the hypertext document of the first digital platform of the financial institution. Claim 8: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider includes payment information of a payment account that is established with the financial institution. Claim 8: The computing system for application programming interface integration according to claim 1, wherein the data entry to the digital program of the second digital platform of the digital wallet service provider includes payment information of a payment account that is established with the financial institution. Independent claims 9 and 14 and their respective dependent claims 10-13 and 15-20 recites subject matter similar to that discussed above in connection with independent claim 1 and its respective dependent claims 2-8. Accordingly, claims 9 and 14 and their respective dependent claims 10-13 and 15-20 are rejected under a similar rationale as independent claim 1 and its respective dependent claims 2-8. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify claims 1-20 of the Patent Document by removing the additional limitations, resulting generally in the claims of the instant Application, since the claims of instant application and the claim recited in the Patent Document actually perform a similar function. It is well settled that the omission of an element and its function is an obvious expedient if the remaining elements perform the same function as before. In re Karison, 136 USPQ 184 (CCPA 1963). Also note Ex parte Rainu, 168 USPQ 375 (Bd. App. 1969). Thus, omission of a reference element whose function is not needed would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure are the following: ROYYURU et al. (US 20210279699 A1) discloses, facilitating push provisioning of a user payment source into a user's digital wallet without the user having a physical card. Cronk et al. (US 20120011567 A1) discloses, providing protected content to subscribers of a managed (e.g., MSO) network via a content source accessible via an internetwork such as the Internet. This includes authenticating the user as a subscriber of the MSO, and determining the subscriber's subscription level. The subscriber may be redirected to a page on the programmers' site where the user can select from a dropdown list or menu structure or other mechanism, their associated MSO. Thereafter, the corresponding login page will be displayed to complete the authentication process based on the implemented approach (i.e., redirect, popup or iframe). MCHUGH et al. (US 20210192519 A1) discloses, securely verifying an identity of a user who is requesting to add or link a financial instrument to a third-party digital wallet using one-tap contactless card authentication. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAHED ALI whose telephone number is (571)270-1085. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 - 5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Neha Patel can be reached on (571) 270-1492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAHED ALI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579532
AUTOMATED DEVICE PAIRING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572927
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND TRANSMITTING ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION ACCOUNT INFORMATION MESSAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12547993
System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Managing Operation of a Remote Terminal
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12511643
USER ASSUMPTION OF IDENTITY OF NFT IN CRYPTO WALLET
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12499436
DETERMINING AN OPTIMUM QUANTITY OF FRACTIONAL NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS TO GENERATE FOR CONTENT AND A CONTENT EXCHANGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.6%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month