Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/358,884

Method and Apparatus for Actively Managing Electric Power Supply for an Electric Power Grid

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 15, 2025
Examiner
EVERETT, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2117
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Causam Enterprises Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
692 granted / 830 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
867
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the term “the power control commands” lacks antecedent basis. The term “the IP-based power control commands” is utilized throughout the claim. For examination purposes, Examiner assumes that “the power control commands” is “the IP-based power control commands”. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding claim 9, the term “the power control commands” lacks antecedent basis. The term “the IP-based power control commands” is utilized throughout the claim. For examination purposes, Examiner assumes that “the power control commands” is “the IP-based power control commands”. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding claim 17, the term “the power control commands” lacks antecedent basis. The term “the IP-based power control commands” is utilized throughout the claim. For examination purposes, Examiner assumes that “the power control commands” is “the IP-based power control commands”. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-8, 10-16, and 18-20 depend, directly or indirectly, from independent claims 1, 9, and 17 and are rejected based on their dependency thereto. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0271470 describes maintaining stable conditions within a power grid. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0040479 (cited by Applicant) describes a power aggregation system for distributed electric resources. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0216994 (cited by Applicant) describes resolving energy imbalance requirements in real-time. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E EVERETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2851. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 am to 5:00 pm (Pacific). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Fennema can be reached at 571-272-2748. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Christopher E. Everett/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2117
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603509
MICROGRID WITH AUTOMATIC LOAD SHARING CONTROL DURING OFF-GRID STANDALONE OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602032
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING ENTERPRISE DIGITAL AUTOMATION PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596352
System and method for controlling a production plant consisting of a plurality of plant parts, in particular a production plant for producing industrial goods such as metallic semi-finished products
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596338
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING OPTIMAL CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585251
METHOD FOR THE DISTRIBUTED CALCULATION OF COMPUTATIONAL TASKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month