Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Causam Enterprises Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's prosecution profile is characterized by its simplicity, with only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved. This indicates that the current patent filings are concentrated within a specific technical niche that does not span multiple examination groups at the patent office.
The busiest examiner, POE, KEVIN T, is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents the only active prosecution for the company, placing significant importance on the examiner's specific feedback and requirements. Because the portfolio only interacts with 1 distinct art unit, the administrative burden is low, and the legal strategy can be tailored specifically to the standards of that unit.
The success of the company's current patent efforts rests on the resolution of the 1 pending office action under the guidance of POE, KEVIN T. Practitioners should focus on the examiner's specific technical background within Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems to craft more persuasive responses. By addressing the 1 pending office action with a clear understanding of the 1 distinct art unit's expectations, the company can more efficiently navigate the prosecution process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POE, KEVIN T | 1 | 39.4% | +16.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17308652 | Systems and Methods for Advanced Energy Network | POE, KEVIN T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17308652 | Systems and Methods for Advanced Energy Network | POE, KEVIN T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3692 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17308652 | Systems and Methods for Advanced Energy Network | POE, KEVIN T | 3692 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 05, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial