Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/362,382

FOLDABLE AND TRANSPORTABLE LANDING PADS AND METHODS OF DEPLOYMENT THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Priority
Oct 18, 2024 — provisional 63/709,230
Examiner
BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW
Art Unit
3647
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cherokee Nation Aerospace And Defense L L C
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
905 granted / 1000 resolved
+38.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1007
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1000 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9, 11, & 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (CN Pub No. 112537457 A). Claims 1 & 11 Wang teaches a mobile landing assistance system (See figures 1-7) comprising: a vehicle (See page 5, lines 14-40 & figure 1, ref # 1) providing mobility; and a landing pad (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) securable to the vehicle (See figures 1-7, ref # 1) for transportation, the landing pad (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) comprising: a first panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) extending in a first direction, the first panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) having a plurality of hinge openings (See figures 1-7, ref # near 53 & 61) along two opposing side edges along the first direction; a second panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52 & 521) hinged to the first panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) at hinge openings of a first of the two opposing side edges; (See figures 1-7) and a third panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52 & 521) hinged to the first panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) at hinge openings of a second of the two opposing side edges, the second panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52 & 521) and the third panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52 & 521) foldable (See figures 1-4) toward each other during transportation (See figures 1-7) and deployable (See figures 5-7) to provide a flat top surface (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) together with the first panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) during use as a helipad. (See page 5, lines 14-40 & figures 1-7, ref # 5) Regarding claim 9 Wang teaches further comprising: a fourth panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52) hinged (See figures 1-7, ref # 53) at an outer edge of the second panel; (See figures 1-7, ref # 521) and a fifth panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52) hinged (See figures 1-7, ref # 53) at an outer edge of the third panel, (See figures 1-7, ref # 521) wherein the fourth panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52) is foldable toward the second panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 521) during transportation and deployable to align with the top surface (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) for use as the helipad, (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) and wherein the fifth panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 52) is foldable toward the third panel (See figures 1-7, ref # 521) during transportation and deployable to align with the top surface (See figures 1-7, ref # 51) for use as the helipad. (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) Regarding claim 19 Wang teaches wherein the vehicle (See figures 1-7, ref # 1) comprises at least one of: a land vehicle (See figures 1-7, ref # 1) configured to tow the landing pad (See figures 1-7, ref # 5) during transportation; (See page 5, lines 14-40 & figure 1, ref # 1) an ariel vehicle configured to lift the landing pad open in air during transportation; or an ariel vehicle configured to enclose and carry the landing pad during transportation. (Further, while Wang specifically mentions the vehicle as a trailer, the helipad is a size that could be loaded into an aircraft or picked up by a helicopter for transportation.) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is allowed. Claims 2-8, 10, & 12-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 2 & 12, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “a plurality of rollers or wheels mounted to and rotatable under the first panel; a plurality of trailer stabilizers; a trailer tongue coupler at a front end of the first panel; and a trailer tongue jack” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claims 2 & 12. Regarding claims 4 & 14, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “wherein the second panel and the third panel respectively comprise: a foldable staircase, ramp or lift; a plurality of storage units underneath the first panel; and one or more hydraulic cylinders hinged on the first panel and configured to respectively power the second panel and the third panel to move between a folded position and a deployed position” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claims 4 & 14. Regarding claims 5 & 15, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “wherein the second panel comprises a locking mechanism and the third panel comprises a corresponding opening to receive a hook of the locking mechanism to secure the second panel and the third panel in a folded position” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claims 5 & 15. Regarding claim 8, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “wherein the first panel has a width no greater than a traffic lane width, and wherein the first panel, the second panel, and the third panel provide a plurality of light-emitting and optical aids for identifying the landing pad” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 8. Regarding claims 10 & 18, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “wherein the fourth panel and the fifth panel respectively comprises a lock-in mechanism that biases respective hinge connections between the fourth panel and the second panel, and the fifth panel and the third panel, to stay aligned with the top surface” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claims 10 & 18. Regarding claim 20, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “and wherein the third panel is locked to the second panel using a locking mechanism in the folded condition; releasing the locking mechanism to allow the second panel and the third panel freely rotate relative to the first panel” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 20. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The reference Conyers et al. (Pub No. US 2017/0137150 A1) discloses a landing pad comprising: a first panel extending in a first direction, the first panel having a plurality of hinge openings along two opposing side edges along the first direction; a second panel hinged to the first panel at hinge openings of a first of the two opposing side edges; and a third panel hinged to the first panel at hinge openings of a second of the two opposing side edges, the second panel and the third panel foldable toward each other during transportation and deployable to provide a flat top surface together with the first panel during use as a helipad. The reference Hadley et al. (US Patent No. 9,403,559 B1) discloses a helicopter transport apparatus, a first panel extending in a first direction, a plurality of rollers or wheels mounted and rotatable under the first panel; a plurality of trailer stabilizers; a trailer tongue coupler at a front end of the first panel; and a trailer tongue jack. The reference Svirsky et al. (Pub No. US 2021/0070468 A1) discloses a mobile stowable/deployable helipad/landing pad, a first panel, a second panel, and third panel. The reference Harris et al. (Pub No. US 2021/0047052 A1) discloses a helipad on a ship, a first panel, and folding second and third panels on opposite side edges. The reference Newcomb (Pub No. US 2020/0010214 A1) discloses a mobile helipad with a first and second panel that folds in half. The reference Van Beest et al. (Pub No. US 2017/0320593 A1) discloses a helipad/landing pad, a plurality of light emitting and/or optical aids for identifying the landing pad. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY ANDREW BONNETTE whose telephone number is (571)270-7556. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kimberly Berona can be reached at 571-272-6909. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY A BONNETTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673769
HYBRID-ELECTRIC VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFT
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669204
A Device As Quick Coupling Interface For Dual Docking And Refuelling
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668351
Actuation assembly for a trailing edge flap of an aircraft wing
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662030
SEAT ASSEMBLY, CLIP, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660942
ELEMENT FOR COVERING A SEAT SUPPORT ELEMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 1m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1000 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month