Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/389,508

System for Preventive Inhibition of Scaling in Oil Wells and Process for Preventive Inhibition of Scaling in Oil Wells

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Priority
Nov 19, 2024 — BR 1020240240790
Examiner
VARMA, ASHISH K
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
344 granted / 462 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
94.2%
+54.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 462 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. For example, the preamble of Claim 1 recites: "A system (S) for preventive inhibition of scaling in oil wells, comprising the following components and interconnections:" (see Lines 1-2). This wording fails to conform with current U.S. practice and should be amended to read ― A system [[(S) ]]for implementing a scale inhibitor in oil wells, comprising For another example, Claim 4 recites "said production string comprises selective completion valves" (see Lines 2-3) (emphasis added). It is unclear how the valves are "selective." If this wording is meant to indicate that the valves can be opened and closed, then the term "selective" should be deleted from the recited phrase because it is unnecessary. All valves open and close. Similarly, in Claim 4, it is not necessary to recite that the Christmas tree is "wet" (see Line 2). For another example, Claim 5 recites "wherein the vessel comprises a tank for storing a scale inhibitor, a tank for industrial water or a saline fluid, and a tank for preparing an inhibitor solution, in which the tank has interconnection with the tanks and" (see Lines 1-3). This wording is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense. Amendment is required. Similar issues, and antecedent basis problems, exist in Claims 6-9 and must be corrected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Belakshe et al (U.S Patent 10,221,658) (“Belakshe”) in view of Headworth (U.S Pub 2003/0056954) (“Headworth”). Regarding Claim 1, Belakshe discloses a system (S) for preventive inhibition of scaling in oil wells (Abstract; Col 3, lines 45-48; Col 9, lines 27-44 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses system and methods for inhibiting the formation of scale downhole), comprising the following components and interconnections: a drilling string interconnected at the top with the rig (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tubular #16 connected to wellhead #14 via line #12 at the top which is a rig as depicted in Figure 1, wherein the system also comprises drill strings, drill pipes, insert strings, liners etc), and interconnected at the bottom with a production string (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses drill strings, drill pipes, insert strings, tubulars, liners); and a reservoir rock that externally surrounds the production string (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses extending a tubular #16 into a subterranean formation that is primarily composed of rock, minerals and other hydrocarbons). Belakshe, however, fails to expressly disclose wherein the system comprises a stimulation vessel interconnected to a completion rig. Headworth teaches the system above comprising a stimulation vessel interconnected to a completion rig (Abstract; Figure 2; Page 6, paragraph [0072] [Wingdings font/0xE0] Headworth teaches a production facility #40 disposed on a platform #42 that may be a floating platform such as a SPAR or a tension leg platform anchored to the ocean floor #44 or another type of floating vessel such as a floating production storage and off take vessel (FPSO) ) for the purpose of processing well fluids produced by a plurality of producing wells in order to enhance the recovery of oil/fluids (Abstract; paragraph [0072]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Belakshe to include a system comprising a stimulation vessel interconnected to a completion rig, as taught by Headworth, because doing so would help to processes well fluids produced by the plurality of producing wells in order to enhance the recovery of oil/fluids. Regarding Claim 2, Headworth teaches the system according to claim 1, wherein the interconnection of the vessel with the rig occurs by means of a transfer pipe directly connected to connection lines present in said rig (Abstract; Figure 2; Page 6, paragraphs [0072] and [0075] [Wingdings font/0xE0] Headworth teaches a production facility #40 disposed on a platform #42 that may be a floating platform such as a SPAR or another type of floating vessel such as a floating production storage and off take vessel (FPSO), the system comprising a pipe #70), and said lines are consecutively connected to a circulation head also present in said rig (paragraph [0111]). Regarding Claim 3, Belakshe discloses the system according to claim 2, wherein the interconnection of the drilling string with the rig occurs by means of the circulation head (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tubular #16 connected to wellhead #14 via line #12 at the top which is a rig as depicted in Figure 1). Regarding Claim 4, Headworth teaches the system according to claim 1, wherein the interconnection of the drilling string with the production string occurs by means of a wet Christmas tree, in which said production string comprises selective completion valves (Figures 2-3; paragraphs [0005] and [0072], Christmas tree #54 comprising a plurality of valves for controlling flow). Regarding Claim 5, Belakshe discloses the system according to claim 1, wherein the vessel comprises a tank for storing a scale inhibitor (Col 8, lines 29-34), a tank for industrial water or a saline fluid, and a tank for preparing an inhibitor solution, in which the tank has interconnection with the tanks (Figure 1, Col 6, lines 1-18 and lines 49-54; Col 13, lines 26-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tank #10 that can be used to store/mix corrosion inhibitors downhole as well as other aqueous solutions). Regarding Claim 6, Belakshe discloses a process (P) for preventive inhibition of scaling in oil wells (Abstract; Col 3, lines 45-48; Col 9, lines 27-44 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses system and methods for inhibiting the formation of scale downhole), wherein it occurs in the system (S), as defined in claim 5, said process (P) comprising the following steps: transferring of the scale inhibitor (Col 8, lines 29-34), initially contained in the tank #10, to the tank; and transfer of industrial water or saline fluid, initially contained in the tank (Figure 1, Col 6, lines 1-18 and lines 49-54; Col 13, lines 26-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tank #10 that can be used to store/mix corrosion inhibitors downhole as well as other aqueous solutions), to the tank; preparing the inhibitor solution in the tank (Figure 1, Col 6, lines 1-18 and lines 49-54; Col 13, lines 26-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tank #10 that can be used to store/mix corrosion inhibitors downhole as well as other aqueous solutions); interconnecting the components in the rig by means of the pipe, connection lines, and circulation head (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tubular #16 connected to wellhead #14 via line #12 at the top which is a rig as depicted in Figure 1, wherein the system also comprises drill strings, drill pipes, insert strings, liners etc); pumping the inhibitor solution from the vessel to the rig through the tubing (Col 12, lines 40-60), followed by pumping said solution to the production string through the drilling string (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses drill strings, drill pipes, insert strings, tubulars, liners); and maneuvering the valves to pump the inhibitor solution (Col 13, lines 26-50 and lines 59-67; Col 14, lines 1-5). Belakshe, however, fails to expressly disclose wherein the process (P) system comprises interconnecting the vessel with the rig and maneuvering the wet Christmas tree and valves to align the treatment with the reservoir rock. Headworth teaches the process (P) system above comprising interconnecting the vessel with the rig (Abstract; Figure 2; Page 6, paragraph [0072] [Wingdings font/0xE0] Headworth teaches a production facility #40 disposed on a platform #42 that may be a floating platform such as a SPAR or a tension leg platform anchored to the ocean floor #44 or another type of floating vessel such as a floating production storage and off take vessel (FPSO) ) and maneuvering the wet Christmas tree and valves to align the treatment with the reservoir rock (Figures 2-3; paragraphs [0005] and [0072], Christmas tree #54 comprising a plurality of valves for controlling flow) for the purpose of processing well fluids produced by a plurality of producing wells in order to enhance the recovery of oil/fluids (Abstract; paragraph [0072]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified Belakshe to include a process (P) system comprising a stimulation vessel interconnected to a completion rig as well as a Christmas tree and valves, as taught by Headworth, because doing so would help to processes well fluids produced by the plurality of producing wells in order to enhance the recovery of oil/fluids. Regarding Claim 7, Belakshe discloses the process according to claim 6, further comprising the following steps: conditioning the reservoir rock after pumping the inhibitor solution from the vessel to the rig through the tubing (Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses a tubular #16 connected to wellhead #14 via line #12 at the top which is a rig as depicted in Figure 1, wherein the system also comprises drill strings, drill pipes, insert strings, liners etc), and pumping said solution to the production string through the drilling string (Col 12, lines 40-60), is completed; allowing action of the inhibitor solution in the reservoir (Col 8, lines 29-34); and preparing the reservoir rock for opening and production (Abstract; Figure 1; Col 13, lines 25-58 [Wingdings font/0xE0] Belakshe discloses extending a tubular #16 into a subterranean formation that is primarily composed of rock, minerals and other hydrocarbons). Regarding Claim 8, Belakshe in view of Headworth teach the process according to claim 6, wherein the preparation of the inhibitor solution (Col 8, lines 29-34) comprises the use of 5,000 liters of the scale inhibitor from the tank #10, and the use of 245,000 liters of water or the use of 245,000 liters of saline fluid, in which the saline fluid, when selected for use in the tank #10, is an aqueous solution of potassium chloride at a concentration of 2 to 3% m/V (Headworth: paragraph [0088]). Regarding Claim 9, Belakshe discloses the process according to claim 8, wherein the scale inhibitor (Col 8, lines 29-34) is a chemical formulation comprising a scale inhibitor selected from the group comprising phosphonates, phosphonate ethers, phosphate esters, polyacrylates, or glucosides, in which said scale inhibitor is present in said chemical formulation at a concentration between 10% and 50% m/V (Col 3, lines 18-28). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Halvorsen et al (U.S Patent 11,555,382) – discloses a subsea hydrocarbon production field comprising first subsea christmas trees, a first manifold and a variety of first flexible flowline jumpers connected between the first manifold and a corresponding first tree (Abstract; Figure 2; Col 4, lines 1-17). Smith et al (U.S Pub 2016/0160111) – discloses methods for removing geothermal scale from a wellbore by introducing a descaling agent and removing at least a portion of the geothermal scale from the geothermal well (Abstract; Figure 1; paragraphs [0016] and [0018]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHISH K VARMA whose telephone number is (571)272-9565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30-5:30pm, Telework Mondays and Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at 571-272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHISH K VARMA/Examiner, Art Unit 3674 /WILLIAM D HUTTON JR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662887
Lost Circulation Material Comprising Reclaimed Fiberglass Wind Turbine Blades
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655725
HYDROGEN PRODUCTION, STORAGE AND RECOVERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12640623
WELL-BASED POTENTIAL ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FEATURING WELL-EXTERNAL SENSING
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637932
MICROBIALLY ENHANCED THERMAL OIL RECOVERY
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631087
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING WELLBORE FLUIDS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.6%)
2y 7m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 462 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month