DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Applicant’s amendments and remarks filed on 05/19/2026 have been fully considered.
Claims 1-3 and 5-12 are pending for examination. Claim 4 is cancelled.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-3 and 5-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims that depend directly or indirectly from claim 1 is/are also rejected due to said dependency. In regard to claims 1 and 12, the claims recite “a light receiver disposed at a first angular interval from the first light source and at a second, different angular interval from the second light source”. It is unclear where the light receiver is disposed at in respect to any claimed structure(s) or defined origin(s) since “angular interval” is a term represents direction/ space. It is noted that there are infinite origin(s) in the space can be used to define “angular intervals” associated with or not associated with the ring device. Clarification is requested by amendments. It is suggested that structural limitations such as “at different locations along an inner circumference of the ring member”, “at different locations (of any element(s)) corresponding to different angles extended from a center origin/ axis of the ring member” or similar limitations should be set forth in order to more clearly define the structural relationship(s) between the elements.
In regard to claim 3, the claim recites “the first opening is disposed between the second opening and the third opening”, which lack of sufficient antecedent bases.
In regard to claim 5, the claim recites “the first angle is smaller than 90 degrees, and the second angle is larger than 90 degrees.
In regard to claim 6, the claim recites “the circuit member”, which lacks of sufficient antecedent basis.
In regard to claim 8, the claim recites “the plurality of openings”, which lacks of sufficient antecedent basis.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1-3 and 5-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over von Badinski et al. (USPGPUB 2015/0220109 – applicant cited) in view of Vock et al. (USPGPUB 2003/0163287 - cited in previous action) and further in view of Banet et. al. (USPGPUB 2006/0122520). In regard to claims 1 and 12, von Badinski discloses a ring-type wearable device (Figs. 1-8 and 12-16 and associated descriptions) comprising: a cover (elements 112/410/412/610/612/812/1214/1412/1510/1514/1610/1614, Figs. 1-8 and 12-16 and associated descriptions); a ring member surrounded by the cover member (inner ring portion or a separated member of elements 412/612/812b/1212/1314/1414/1512, Figs. 1-8 and 12-16 and associated descriptions; and a circuit disposed between the cover and the ring member (elements 415/500/615/815/1240/1340/1440/1540, Figs. 4-8 and 12-15 and associated descriptions), the circuit including a PCB with a plurality of sections connected by flexible folding/ connecting portions (Figs. 4-5, 8, 12F, 14B, and 15B and associated descriptions), wherein the plurality of PCBs include a photo-plethysmography (PPG) sensor (element 220, Fig. 2 and associated descriptions; heart rate sensor/ pulse oximetry sensor, [0169]; [0189]) including a first light source configured to emit light to a finger surrounded by the ring-type wearable device (red LED 320b, Figs. 2 and 3B and associated descriptions), a second light source configured to emit light to the finger (IR LED 320d, Figs. 2 and 3B and associated descriptions), and a light receiver (light sensor 320c, Figs. 2 and 3B and associated descriptions), and wherein the light receiver is configured to receive light emitted from at least one of the first light source or the second light source and reflected by a blood vessel inside the finger surrounded by the ring-type wearable device (finger, abstract; heart rate sensor/ pulse oximetry sensor, [0169]; [0189]).
von Badinski does not specifically discloses a plurality of printed circuit boards (PCBs) and a flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) electrically connected with the plurality of PCBs.
Vock teaches a wearable device comprises activity sensors (Figs. 1-2, 7-8 and 48 and associated descriptions) comprises a flex circuit (element 684, Fig. 48 and associated descriptions; [0322]) including a battery (element 690, Fig. 48 and associated descriptions; [0322]), a plurality of mini PCBs (element 686, Fig. 48 and associated descriptions; [0322]) and a flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) electrically connected with the plurality of PCBs (Kapton flex circuit 688, Fig. 48 and associated descriptions; [0322]) and the wearable can be utilized to wrap about objects and persons ([0322]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the configuration of a PCB with a plurality of sections connected by flexible folding/ connecting portions (von Badinski) with the configuration of plurality of PCBs connected by a flexible printed circuit board as taught by Vock to yield predictable results, since both configurations are alternative equivalent configurations to provide electrical connections between electric components in a foldable/ bendable PCB device. The rationale would have been the simple substitution of one known, equivalent element for another to obtain predictable results (obvious to substitute elements, devices, etc.), KSR, 550, U.S. at 417.
von Badinski as modified by Vock discloses all the claimed limitations except the first light source comprises a plurality of first light emitters, a second light source comprises a plurality of second light emitters and a light receiver disposed at a first angular interval from the first light source and at a second, different angular interval from the second light source/ wherein each of the first light source and the second light source includes at least two light emitting diodes (LEDs) disposed adjacent to one another and is exposed to the finger through the ring member. It is noted that the limitations are rejected as best understood, see the 35 USC 112(b) rejection above.
Banet teaches a ring PPG/ pulse oximetry device (Figs. 1-5 and associated descriptions) comprises at least two/ a plurality optical modules (abstract; modules 4-11, Figs. 1-5 and associated descriptions), wherein each of the optical modules including a plurality of light emitters (e.g. first light source of R6 and IR6 in the module 6/6A; second light source R5 and IR5 in the module 5/5A, Figs. 2-4 and associated descriptions)/ wherein each of the first light source and the second light source includes at least two light emitting diodes (LEDs) disposed adjacent to one another and is exposed to the finger through a ring member (e.g. R6 and IR6 in the module 6/6A; R5 and IR5 in the module 5/5A, Figs. 2-4 and associated descriptions) and a light receiver disposed at a first angular interval of the ring member from the first light source and at a second, different angular interval of the ring member from the second light source in respect to the origin/ center axis of the ring member (any light receiver of 4B-11B, Fig. 2 and associated descriptions; e.g. receiver 7B disposed between modules 5 and 6) and configured to receive light emitted from at least one of the first light source and the second light source and reflected by a blood vessel inside a finger surrounded by the ring device (Figs. 3-5 and associated descriptions; [0021]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the ring-type device (von Badinski as modified by Vock) to incorporate the multiple optical modules configuration(s) and associated functions/elements as taught by Banet, since both devices are ring type PPG/ pulse oximetry systems and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the configuration(s) as taught by Banet facilitate reduce motion/ noise in the PPG signals (see Banet). The rationale would have been to obtain more accurate optical measurements.
In regard to claim 2, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses each of the cover and the ring member includes a metallic material ([0179]; [0188]; [0194] of von Badinski).
In regard to claim 3, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses the first light source is disposed between the second light source and the light receiver on the plurality of PCBs (referring to claim 1 above), and wherein the first opening is disposed between the second opening and the third opening on the inner surface of the ring member (rejected as best understood, see the 35 USC 112(b) rejection above; Figs. 2, 3, 7-8 and 15A and associated descriptions of von Badinski).
In regard to claim 5, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses the first angle is smaller than 90 degrees, and the second angle is larger than 90 degrees ((rejected as best understood, see the 35 USC 112(b) rejection above; any angles can be defined in Figs. 2, 3, 7-8 and 15A and associated descriptions of von Badinski and Figs. 2-4 and associated descriptions of Banet).
In regard to claim 6, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses the ring member includes a groove, and at least a portion of the circuit member is disposed in the groove along the inner surface of the ring member (element 812b/1212a-b/1412, Figs. 8, 12E and 14A and associated descriptions of von Badinski ).
In regard to claim 7, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses a battery disposed between the ring member and the cover member such that the battery and the ring member have a same or a similar curvature (battery 480/680/1330/1430, Figs. 4, 6, 13, and 14A and associated descriptions; [0182] of von Badinski).
In regard to claim 8, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses a charge terminal exposed through a fourth opening of the plurality of openings and configured to charge the battery (optical charge terminal with an opening in the ring member, Figs. 17A-G and associated descriptions of von Badinski).
In regard to claim 9, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses the first light source and the second light source include at least two red light emitting diodes (LEDs) and at least two infrared light emitting diodes (LEDs) (referring to claim 1 above).
In regard to claim 10, von Badinski as modified by Vock discloses an acceleration sensor disposed on a first surface of at least one of the PCBs (accelerometers, Fig. 2 and associated descriptions; [0167]; [0251]; the modules 210-270 (of FIG. 2) are formed on a PCB, [0187] of von Badinski) and the PPG sensor is disposed on at least one of the PCBs (Fig. 2 and 3B associated descriptions of von Badinski). von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet does not specifically discloses the acceleration sensor disposed on an opposite of the at least one of the PCBs. However, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet further discloses electronic components can be disposed on both sides of the at least one of the PCBs (Figs. 3A-3B and associated descriptions of von Badinski). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the configuration with both/ two side mounting configuration to yield predictable result. Since both configurations are alternative equivalent ways for disposing electronic components on PCBs. The rationale would have been the simple substitution of one known, equivalent element for another to obtain predictable results (obvious to substitute elements, devices, etc.), KSR, 550, U.S. at 417.
In regard to claim 11, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet discloses an antenna disposed within the housing (element 2720, Fig. 27A and associated descriptions of von Badinski) but does not specifically disclose the antenna is disposed on an inner surface of the cover. However, von Badinski as modified by Vock and Banet further discloses an embodiment which electronic components can be disposed on an inner surface of the cover member via intermediate components (elements 1450/1440 are disposed on an inner surface of the external housing 1412 via element 1442 or 1430, Figs. 14A, 14D and 14E and associated descriptions of von Badinski). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the location of the antenna with the configuration of the additional embodiment as taught by von Badinski to yield predictable result, since both configurations are alternative equivalent configurations for disposing an electronic component within the wearable ring device. The rationale would have been the simple substitution of one known, equivalent element for another to obtain predictable results (obvious to substitute elements, devices, etc.), KSR, 550, U.S. at 417.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s amendment and argument with respect to claim 1 and new claim 12 filed on 05/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are deemed to be moot in views of the new grounds of rejection.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHU CHUAN LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-5507. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th (6am-6pm).
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Robertson can be reached at (571) 272-5001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/CHU CHUAN LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Prosecution Insights