Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 19/419,038

DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 14, 2025
Priority
Dec 30, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0200666
Examiner
MERCEDES, DISMERY E
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
758 granted / 982 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 982 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/14/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 10-11, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) As to Claim 1, Li et al. discloses A display device comprising: a light-emitting device (fig.11, OLED D; para.0078); and a color control portion disposed on the light-emitting device (fig.4, 11, color filter substrate 1; para.0078), the color control portion comprising: a bank (fig.4, black matrix 12 includes bank 121; para.0042) in which a color control hole is defined (para.0042, space defined by carrier substrate 11, first bank 121 and second bank 131), the bank including a top surface (fig.4, upper surface of black matrix layer 12 which includes bank 121) including: a surface treatment region including: a first surface treatment region disposed next to a hole perimeter of the color control hole (fig.4, black matrix layer 12 including bank 121 next to space (photoresist 15), and may be formed of an organic resin or inorganic thin film {inner upper surface of bank 121 read as first surface treatment region}; para.0060-0061) and having a first contact angle (fig.4, contact angle of bank 121; para.0062); and a second surface treatment region spaced apart from the hole perimeter with the first surface treatment region interposed therebetween (fig.4, dam layer 13 includes bank 131 and is disposed above first bank 121 and may be formed of a thin film {overlapping area where bank 131 is disposed above bank 121 is read as second surface treatment region} and spaced apart from space region (photoresist 15) and first bank 121 interposed therebetween; para.0062,0064) and having a second contact angle greater than the first contact angle (para.0062-a contact angle of bank 131 is greater than contact angle of bank 121), a color control layer formed in the color control hole (fig.4, color photoresist layer 15; para.0042,0066). As to Claim 2, Li et al. discloses wherein the first surface treatment region includes the hole perimeter (fig.4, bank 121 adjacent space (photoresist 15)), and the second surface treatment region includes an outermost perimeter of the surface treatment region (fig.4, bank 131 above bank 121). As to Claim 3, Li et al. discloses, wherein the second surface treatment region and the first surface treatment region contact each other (fig.4, bank 131 disposed above (outer surface) of bank 121) As to Claim 6, Li et al. discloses wherein the color control hole comprises a first color control hole and a second color control hole next to each other, and the color control layer comprises a first color control layer and a second color control layer having different colors from each other and filling the first color control hole and the second color control hole, respectively (fig.4, space filled with red photoresist R, space filled with green photoresist G; para.0066). As to Claim 10, Li et al. discloses wherein the color control hole comprises a first color control hole, a second color control hole and a third color control hole, and the color control layer includes a first color control layer, a second color control layer and a third color control layer having different colors from each other and filling the first color control hole, the second color control hole and the third color control hole, respectively (fig.4, space filled with red photoresist R, space filled with green photoresist G, space filled with blue photoresist B; para.0066). As to Claim 11, Li et al. discloses wherein the first color control layer, the second color control layer and the third color control layer serve as a red color layer, a green color layer and a blue color layer, respectively (fig.4, red photoresist R, green photoresist G, blue photoresist B; para.0066). As to Claim 14, Li et al. discloses which the display device does not include a polarizing plate (as depicted in fig. 11 and respective description thereof). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) in view of Kim (US 2022/0208905). As to Claim 4, Li et al. does not expressly disclose, but Kim discloses wherein the surface treatment region further comprises a third surface treatment region spaced apart from the first surface treatment region with the second surface treatment region therebetween (fig.2, third bank 330 spaced apart from bank 310 with bank 320 therebetween; para.0074, 0076). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective fling date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Li et al. with the teachings of Kim, such that a third bank disposed on second bank 131 (of Li). The motivation to provide separation between pixel columns and prevent solution from being mixed. Li et al. in view of Kim do not expressly disclose the third surface treatment region has a third contact angle greater than the second contact angle of the second surface treatment region. However, Li et al. in view of Kim, Li et al. discloses a contact angle of the first bank 121 is less than a contact angle of the second bank 131 (Li-para.0062). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device such that a contact angle bank 131 less than of third bank. The motivation being since in doing so would not have modified the operation of the device yielding predictable results, in particular improved evenness, uniform film thickness, and reduced risk of displaying color mixing. As to Claim 5, Li et al. in view of Kim disclose wherein the first surface treatment region includes the hole perimeter (Li-fig.4, bank 121 adjacent space (photoresist 15)), and the third surface treatment region includes an outermost perimeter of the surface treatment region (Li-fig.4; Kim-fig.2, bank 330 farthest hole (220 located) perimeter). Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) in view of Jun et al. (US 2019/0198574). As to Claim 12, Li et al. does not expressly disclose, but Jun et al. discloses: wherein an area of ​​the third color control layer is smaller than an area of ​​each of the first color control layer and the second color control layer (fig.4, para.0098; a thickness of the blue control layer 210c smaller than of green control layer and the red control layer). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Li et al. with the teachings of Jun et al., the motivation being to implement a color of desired wavelength according to a thickness of the color control layer. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) in view of Lin et al. (US 2021/0028327). As to Claim 13, Li et al. discloses wherein the color control portion further comprises: a base layer on which the bank and the color control layer are arranged (fig.4, substrate 11). Li et al. does not expressly disclose, but Lin et al. discloses: a light-scattering layer disposed between the color control layer and the base layer to selectively overlap the first color control layer and the second color control layer among the first color control layer, the second color control layer and the third color control layer (fig.5, light scattering layer 346 between light conversion layer 306 and protection layer 348, overlapping red and green light conversion layer; para.0055-0056,0059). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Li et al. with the teachings of Lin et al., the motivation being to uniformly diffuse the converted light generated by the light conversion layer. Claim(s) 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) in view of Nakatani et al. (US 2012/0228602). As to Claim 15, Li et al. discloses A display device comprising: a light-emitting device (fig.11, OLED D; para.0078); and a color control portion disposed on the light-emitting device (fig.4, 11, color filter substrate 1; para.0078), the color control portion comprising: a bank (fig.4, black matrix 12 includes bank 121; para.0042) in which a color control hole is defined (para.0042, space defined by carrier substrate 11, first bank 121 and second bank 131), the bank comprising: a top surface including: a surface treatment region having a contact angle which increases in a region farther from a hole perimeter of the color control hole in a radial direction of the color control hole (fig.4, black matrix layer 12 including bank 121 may be formed of an organic resin or inorganic thin film and has a contact angle of bank 121; para.0060-0062); and a color control layer formed in the color control hole (fig.4, color photoresist layer 15; para.0042,0066). Li et al. discloses a contact angle of the first bank 121 is less than a contact angle of the second bank 131 (para.0062). Li et al. does not expressly disclose a contact angle which increases in a region farther from a hole perimeter of the color control hole in a radial direction of the color control hole Nakatani et al. discloses a bank having a contact angle which increases in a region farther from a hole perimeter of the color control hole in a radial direction of the color control hole (fig.2-3, para.0113-0114; the contact angle increases in radial direction (16c to 16a)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Li et al. by implementing a bank as disclosed by Nakatani et al., the motivation being to obtain gradient wettability along the height of the bank. As to Claim 16, Li et al. in view of Nakatani et al. disclose wherein the surface treatment region is provided in plural, and a plurality of surface treatment regions have contact angles which increase stepwise from the hole perimeter (Li-fig.4 bank 131, para.0062, contact angle of the first bank 121 is less than a contact angle of the second bank 131; Nakatani-fig.2-contact angle increases as the height of the bank increases; para.0113-0114). As to Claim 17, Li et al. in view of Nakatani et al. disclose wherein the contact angle of the surface treatment region continuously increases from the hole perimeter (Nakatani-fig.2-contact angle increases as the height of the bank increases; para.0113-0114). As to Claim 18, LI et al. in view of Nakatani et al. disclose wherein the surface treatment region is provided in plural (Li-fig.4, each of bank 131 above bank 121 ), the color control hole is provided in plural (Li-fig.4, space where photoresist 15 R,G,B is disposed), a plurality of color control holes are surrounded by a plurality of surface treatment regions, respectively (Li-fig.4, space where photoresist 15 R,G,B is disposed surrounded by banks 121, 131), and the surface treatment regions are spaced apart from each other on the top surface of the bank (Li-fig.4, bank 131 above bank 121). Claim(s) 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US 2019/0386253) in view of Jang et al. (US 2021/0408109). As to Claim 19, Li et al. discloses An electronic device comprising: a display device comprising: a light-emitting device (fig.11, OLED D; para.0078); and a color control portion disposed on the light-emitting device (fig.4, 11, color filter substrate 1; para.0078), the color control portion comprising: a bank (fig.4, black matrix 12 includes bank 121; para.0042) in which a color control hole is defined (para.0042, space defined by carrier substrate 11, first bank 121 and second bank 131), the bank including a top surface (fig.4, upper surface of black matrix layer 12 which includes bank 121) including: a surface treatment region including: a first surface treatment region disposed next to a hole perimeter of the color control hole (fig.4, black matrix layer 12 including bank 121 next to space (photoresist 15)), and may be formed of an organic resin or inorganic thin film {inner upper surface of bank 121 read as first surface treatment region}; para.0060-0061) and having a first contact angle (fig.4, contact angle of bank 121; para.0062); and a second surface treatment region spaced apart from the hole perimeter with the first surface treatment region interposed therebetween (fig.4, dam layer 13 includes bank 131 and is disposed above first bank 121 and may be formed of a thin film {overlapping area where bank 131 is disposed above bank 121 is read as second surface treatment region} and spaced apart from space region (photoresist 15) and first bank 121 interposed therebetween; para.0062,0064) and having a second contact angle greater than the first contact angle (para.0062-a contact angle of bank 131 is greater than contact angle of bank 121), a color control layer formed in the color control hole (fig.4, color photoresist layer 15; para.0042,0066). Li et al. does not expressly disclose, but Jang et al. discloses: a memory (para.0052); and a processor which executes data included in the memory and controls an operation of the display device (para.0052). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Li et al. with the teachings of Jang et al., in order to perform various functions of the device. As to Claim 20, Li et al. in view of Jang et al. disclose wherein the electronic device includes virtual reality or augmented reality glasses, a smartphone, a tablet personal computer, a laptop, a television, a desk monitor, smart glasses, a head-mounted display, a smart watch, or a vehicle display (Jang-para.0003). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 7 is allowable over the prior art of record since the cited references alone or in combination do not teach or suggest “wherein the surface treatment region is provided in plural, and a surface treatment region surrounding the first color control hole among surface treatment regions and a surface treatment region surrounding the second color control hole among the surface treatment regions are separated with a separation distance interposed therebetween on a portion of the top surface of the bank between the first color control hole and the second color control hole” along with the other limitations in the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DISMERY E. MERCEDES whose telephone number is (571)272-7558. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DISMERY MERCEDES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770548
DYNAMIC SLEEP FOR A DISPLAY PANEL
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755672
DISPLAY APPARATUSES, DISPLAY PANELS, AND METHODS OF DRIVING DISPLAY PANELS
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755696
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING A DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749435
OPTICAL COMPENSATION DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF OPTICALLY COMPENSATING DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744002
FREQUENCY VARIABLE DISPLAY DEVICE AND FLICKER COMPENSATION METHOD OF THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 6m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 982 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month