Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/422,983

DOWNHOLE DEVICE EMPLOYING AN ELECTROMAGNET ASSEMBLY AND FERROMAGNET ASSEMBLY TO ACTUATE A MOVABLE FEATURE

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Priority
Dec 18, 2024 — provisional 63/735,424
Examiner
BOMAR, THOMAS S
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
749 granted / 903 resolved
+30.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 903 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 11-17, 26-30, and 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 20110120728 to Lake et al. Regarding claims 1, 16, and 32, Lake discloses a method and well system (see paragraph 0001) with a downhole device, the device comprising: a member 16 having a first member end and a second opposite member end; a movable element 22 positioned about the member, the movable element having a first movable element end and a second opposite movable element end, the movable element configured to move a stroke distance (D) from a first position (fig. 1) to a second position; a ferromagnet assembly 32 or 40 fixed to one of the member or the movable element; and an electromagnet assembly 32 or 40 fixed to an other of the movable element or the member, the electromagnet assembly operable to receive electric power to produce an electromagnetic field having an electromagnetic polarity (Y), the electromagnetic field configured to actuate the movable element from the first position toward the second position and independently hold the movable element in the second position when the electromagnet assembly receives the electric power (figs. 1 and 3; paragraphs 0010-0022). Regarding claims 2 and 17, the downhole device as recited in Claims 1 and 16, wherein the ferromagnet assembly is a permanent magnet assembly, the permanent magnet assembly producing an inherent magnetic field having a magnetic polarity (X), the permanent magnet assembly generating a magnetic coupling force that biases the movable element toward the first position (paragraphs 0017, 0032-0034; claim 5). Regarding claims 11 and 26, the downhole device as recited in Claims 1 and 16, wherein the electromagnet assembly is operable to receive electric power to produce the electromagnetic field having the electromagnetic polarity (Y), the electromagnetic field configured to linearly actuate the movable element from the first position toward the second position (paragraphs 0032-0034). Regarding claims 12 and 27, the downhole device as recited in Claims 1 and 16, wherein the ferromagnet assembly is fixed to the movable element 22 and the electromagnet assembly is fixed to the member 16 (fig. 1, and paragraph 0017 states that assemblies 32 and 40 can be either ferromagnetic (permanent) or electromagnetic). Regarding claims 13 and 28, the downhole device as recited in Claims 1 and 16, wherein the member is part of a flow control valve housing 12, the movable element is a movable flow control element, and further including a valve closure mechanism 24 coupled with the flow control valve housing, the movable element configured to actuate between the first position and the second position and thereby move the valve closure mechanism between a closed state and an open state (fig. 1). Regarding claims 14 and 29, the downhole device as recited in Claims 13 and 28, wherein the movable flow control element is a movable flow control tube (paragraph 0010). Regarding claims 15 and 30, the downhole device as recited in Claims 14 and 29, wherein the valve closure mechanism is a flapper-type valve configured to rotate between the closed state and the open state as the movable flow control tube moves between the first position and the second position (paragraph 0010). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10, 18-25, and 31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20180163657 teaches a magnetic valve mechanism of interest, but it is for a fuel injection valve, not for downhole use. US 20170241246 teaches a downhole device with ferromagnets 26 and electromagnets 21 (figs 3-8), but it is for a pump, not for opening/closing a valve. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANE BOMAR whose telephone number is (571)272-7026. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am-3:30pm EST M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at 571-272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHANE BOMAR/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680407
DOWNHOLE RELEASABLE VIBRATORY TOOL, SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662382
Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Table with Polycrystalline Diamond Extensions Therefrom
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654807
COMBINED DISC-TYPE CAVITATION STRUCTURE FOR UNDERWATER NAVIGATION OF UNDERWATER VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655739
SAND CATCHER FOR DOWNHOLE PUMP AND METHOD FOR USING SAME
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644360
WELLBORE SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING OPERATIONS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.2%)
2y 2m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 903 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month