Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/434,161

INTERNAL COMPENSATION PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DRIVING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Priority
Jan 24, 2025 — CN 2025101218346
Examiner
AMADIZ, RODNEY
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Everdisplay Optronics (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 655 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
664
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 8 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ikeda (USPGPUB 2013/0222440—hereinafter “Ikeda”). As to Claim 1, Ikeda teaches an internal compensation pixel driving circuit (See Fig. 1), comprising: a light-emitting control subcircuit (Fig. 1 at Tr5), a compensation subcircuit (Tr4), a driving subcircuit (D-Tr), a reset subcircuit (Tr3), a first writing subcircuit (Tr1 + C1), a second writing subcircuit (Tr2) and a light-emitting component (EL); wherein the compensation subcircuit (Tr4), the light-emitting control subcircuit (Fig. 1 at Tr5) and a first terminal of the driving subcircuit (D-Tr) are connected to a fourth node (node connecting Tr5, Tr4 and D-Tr), the compensation subcircuit (Tr4), the first writing subcircuit (Tr1 + C1) and a gate of the driving subcircuit (D-Tr) are connected to a second node (node at Vg), the reset subcircuit (Tr3), the light-emitting component (EL) and a second terminal of the driving subcircuit (D-Tr) are connected to a third node (node at Va), and the second writing subcircuit (Tr2) and the first writing subcircuit (Tr1 + C1) are connected to a first node (node at left side of C1); and the driving subcircuit provides a driving current for the light-emitting component (Pg. 2, ¶ 25), and the compensation subcircuit is used to eliminate an influence of a threshold voltage of the driving subcircuit on a light-emitting current provided by the light-emitting component (Pg. 1, ¶ 9, Pg. 2, ¶ 12, Pg. 4, ¶’s 54 and 56). As to Claim 8, all of the claim limitations have been met with respect to claim 1 (see above) with the exception of a display panel comprising the internal compensation pixel driving circuit. Ikeda teaches a display panel comprising the internal compensation pixel driving circuit (Pg. 1, ¶ 2 and Fig. 7 at 13). As to Claims 2 and 9, Ikeda teaches that the driving subcircuit is an oxide N-type thin film transistor (Pg. 5, claim 7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to Claim 15, the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination, “A driving method of an internal compensation pixel driving circuit, wherein the internal compensation pixel driving circuit comprises: a light-emitting control subcircuit, a compensation subcircuit, a driving subcircuit, a reset subcircuit, a first writing subcircuit, a second writing subcircuit and a light-emitting component; wherein the compensation subcircuit, the light-emitting control subcircuit and a first terminal of the driving subcircuit are connected to a fourth node, the compensation subcircuit, the first writing subcircuit and a gate of the driving subcircuit are connected to a second node, the reset subcircuit, the light-emitting component and a second terminal of the driving subcircuit are connected to a third node, and the second writing subcircuit and the first writing subcircuit are connected to a first node; and the driving subcircuit provides a driving current for the light-emitting component, and the compensation subcircuit is used to eliminate an influence of a threshold voltage of the driving subcircuit on a light-emitting current provided by the light-emitting component; wherein the internal compensation pixel driving circuit further comprises: a data terminal connected to the first writing subcircuit; a first control terminal connected to a gate of the reset subcircuit; a second control terminal connected to a gate of the first writing subcircuit and a gate of the compensation subcircuit; a third control terminal connected to a gate of the second writing subcircuit; a fourth control terminal connected to a gate of the light-emitting control subcircuit, wherein the driving method comprises following stages: in a first stage, inputting a high-level signal to the first control terminal and the second control terminal, inputting a low-level signal to the third control terminal and the fourth control terminal, the compensation subcircuit and the first writing subcircuit being in a conducting state, and transmitting a data signal of the data terminal to the first node; in a second stage, inputting a high-level signal to the first control terminal and the third control terminal, inputting a low-level signal to the second control terminal and the fourth control terminal, the second writing subcircuit and the reset subcircuit being in a conducting state, and writing a data signal to the second node; and in a third stage, inputting a high-level signal to the third control terminal and the fourth control terminal, inputting a low-level signal to the first control terminal and the second control terminal, the second writing subcircuit and the light-emitting control circuit being in a conducting state, controlling a working state of the driving subcircuit by a data signal, and driving the light-emitting component to emit light.” (As claimed, emphasis added) Claims 16-20 depend upon claim 15 and thus are also allowed. Claims 3-7 and 10-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As to Claims 3 and 10, the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination, “a data terminal connected to the first writing subcircuit; a first control terminal connected to a gate of the reset subcircuit; a second control terminal connected to a gate of the first writing subcircuit and a gate of the compensation subcircuit; a third control terminal connected to a gate of the second writing subcircuit; a fourth control terminal connected to a gate of the light-emitting control subcircuit.” (As claimed, emphasis added) Claims 4-6 and 11-13 depend upon claims 3 and 10, respectively and thus are also objected. As to Claims 7 and 14, the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest, either alone or in combination, “a reset circuit, wherein the reset circuit is connected to the fourth node.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Wang et al. USPGPUB 2012/0306843 (Figs. 2-7) Liu et al. USPGPUB 2015/0294624 (Fig. 2) Tseng et al. USPGPUB 2016/0217741 (Fig. 3) Wang USPGPUB 2022/0310009 (Figs. 4A-4B) Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY AMADIZ whose telephone number is (571)272-7762. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Thurs; 9AM - 5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY AMADIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738250
DISPLAY DEVICE, MANUFCTURING METHOD THEREOF, DRIVING METHOD THEREOF, AND ELECRONIC DEVICE USING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726561
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY, OPERATING METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12684671
Image Conversion to Lighting Control Map for Peripheral Device
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675153
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675215
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN AN INPUT DEVICE AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 4m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month