Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Everdisplay Optronics (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These matters are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, showing that each active application is being reviewed by a different individual. The portfolio spans 3 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's filings are classified under several different technical groups at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is AMADIZ, RODNEY, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. As the 3 pending office actions are spread among 3 distinct examiners, no single individual dominates the prosecution landscape. This distribution requires the company to manage three different examiner styles within the Communications sector.
Managing 3 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units requires a strategy that can accommodate different technical standards. Because AMADIZ, RODNEY handles 1 pending office action, the company's success is distributed across the decisions of all 3 distinct examiners. This variety ensures that the portfolio's progress is not overly dependent on the discretion of any one official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMADIZ, RODNEY | 1 | 79.7% | +12.9% |
| FREEMAN, JOHN D | 1 | 45.9% | +6.8% |
| JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | 1 | 67.0% | +19.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18846682 | ANTISTATIC COATING AND DISPLAY PANEL INCLUDING THE SAME | FREEMAN, JOHN D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19434161 | INTERNAL COMPENSATION PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DRIVING METHOD | AMADIZ, RODNEY | — |
| 18728088 | SHIFT REGISTER UNIT, GATE DRIVE CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE | JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2622 | 1 |
| 1787 | 1 |
| 2626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19434161 | INTERNAL COMPENSATION PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DRIVING METHOD | AMADIZ, RODNEY | 2622 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 29, 2025 |
| 18846682 | ANTISTATIC COATING AND DISPLAY PANEL INCLUDING THE SAME | FREEMAN, JOHN D | 1787 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 13, 2024 |
| 18728088 | SHIFT REGISTER UNIT, GATE DRIVE CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE | JANSEN II, MICHAEL J | 2626 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial