Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 35/525,776

Massaging chair

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Priority
Jan 08, 2024 — RE 30-2024-0000867
Examiner
BOHANNON, PAUL D
Art Unit
2951
Tech Center
2900
Assignee
Ceragem Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
98%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 98% — above average
98%
Career Allowance Rate
601 granted / 614 resolved
+37.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
618
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
83.3%
+43.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 614 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION General Information The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment of 08/31/2026 is acknowledged. Following the amendment of 08/31/2026, the objection to the specification has been overcome, and the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) has been partially addressed. However, the applicant’s amendment has not fully addressed the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b). Therefore, the claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b), and the rejection is MADE FINAL in the following office action. Claim Rejection - 35 USC 112(a) & (b) The claim is FINALLY rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b), as the claimed invention is not described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as the invention. The claim is indefinite and nonenabling because the design appears inconsistently throughout the reproductions provided in the specification. REPS. 1.6 and 1.7 create inconsistencies in the appearance of the claimed design. These representations show a small square feature with solid lines, and a vertical, solid line behind the square feature. Conversely, REP. 1.3 shows these features with broken lines. Therefore, the design is shown inconsistent in the reproductions. See annotated reproductions: PNG media_image1.png 932 1630 media_image1.png Greyscale The applicant’s amendment has been fully considered but does not address all issues raised in the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b). The exact appearance of the claimed design cannot be understood because it is not consistently/accurately shown. In order to overcome this rejection, the examiner recommends amending representations 1.6 and 1.7 to show the small square feature, and vertical solid line behind the square feature, with broken lines, in order to make these representations consistent with the design shown in REPS. 1.1-1.5. See annotated drawing: PNG media_image2.png 342 652 media_image2.png Greyscale Conclusion The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) is MADE FINAL. A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL BOHANNON whose telephone number is (408)918-7663. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, the applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jennifer Rempfer, can be reached at (571) 270-0248 or jennifer.rempfer@USPTO.GOV. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto. gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto. gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D BOHANNON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2932
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 31, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent D1135482
Easy chair
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent D1128318
Garden chair
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent D1128319
Garden chair
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent D1127473
Easy chair
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent D1127470
Easy chair
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
98%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+0.6%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 614 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month