Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ceragem Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 37 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ceragem Co. Ltd. has 5 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are spread across 4 distinct art units, showing that the company's current filings cover multiple technical categories and specialized groups within the patent office. This distribution suggests a range of mechanical and medical innovations being pursued simultaneously.

The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners, with each pending action assigned to a different person. This ratio between pending office actions and distinct examiners means that the applicant must navigate different sets of examiner preferences and styles. PAUL D BOHANNON is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action.

Managing pending office actions across 4 distinct art units requires a broad understanding of various patent office procedures. Since there are distinct examiners involved, the company's legal strategy must be adaptable to different individual requirements. PAUL D BOHANNON and the other examiners represent a cross-section of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area, reflecting the breadth of the current portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
2
Medium (40%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§112 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOHANNON, PAUL D 1 97.9% +0.6%
WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID 1 97.2% +3.1%
PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 1 62.0% +43.0%
TOICH, SARA KATHERINE 1 50.0% +47.1%
BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA 1 20.0% +63.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
35525776 Massaging chair BOHANNON, PAUL D —
35525629 Easy chair WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18154108 ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PREDICTING AND DIAGNOSING SCOLIOSIS AND ITS OPERATING METHOD BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18539783 THERMO-THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 77d overdue
18254831 PRESSURE MODULE AND THERMOTHERAPY APPARATUS COMPRISING SAME TOICH, SARA KATHERINE 31d overdue
18154108 ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PREDICTING AND DIAGNOSING SCOLIOSIS AND ITS OPERATING METHOD BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3785 2
2951 1
2931 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
35525776 Massaging chair BOHANNON, PAUL D 2951 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2024
35525629 Easy chair WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID 2931 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2024
18539783 THERMO-THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 3785 §103 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2023
18254831 PRESSURE MODULE AND THERMOTHERAPY APPARATUS COMPRISING SAME TOICH, SARA KATHERINE 3785 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending May 26, 2023
18154108 ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PREDICTING AND DIAGNOSING SCOLIOSIS AND ITS OPERATING METHOD BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA 3791 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 13, 2023

Managing Ceragem Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month