Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
4Mindsai Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. This portfolio of 2 pending actions reflects the company's active pursuit of patent protection for its computing and software innovations. The focus on the Computing & Software sector is the primary area of activity for its current filings, showing a commitment to securing rights in a competitive technological field.
The prosecution is distributed among 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each active case is being handled by a different individual at the patent office. The involvement of 2 distinct art units further indicates that each of these 2 pending office actions is being reviewed within a different specialized department, requiring the company to adapt to different departmental guidelines and standards.
LANE, THOMAS BERNARD is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the total pending office actions number 2 and the busiest examiner pending count is 1, the workload is perfectly distributed across the 2 distinct examiners. This decentralized structure across 2 distinct art units requires the company to manage two separate examiner relationships simultaneously to advance its 2 total pending office actions and secure its patent rights.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | 1 | 76.5% | +5.0% |
| MAYE, AYUB A | 1 | 57.8% | +41.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19014024 | ADAPTIVE MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR CYBERSECURITY APPLICATIONS | MAYE, AYUB A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2142 | 1 |
| 2436 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19563165 | Framework for Large-Scale Distributed Language Model Training | LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | 2142 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 11, 2026 |
| 19014024 | ADAPTIVE MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR CYBERSECURITY APPLICATIONS | MAYE, AYUB A | 2436 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 08, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial