Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
A Big Chunk of Mud LLC has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single matter is assigned to examiner JITESH PATEL. The prosecution is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit. Since there is only 1 pending office action, the company's current patent office engagement is limited to this one case under 1 distinct examiner. JITESH PATEL is the only official the company must interact with for its current prosecution.
The absence of other pending matters means there is no diversification across different examiners or art units. The company's progress in the Communications sector is currently tied to the outcome of this case. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the technical scope of the company's current prosecution is very specific. This 1 pending office action is the only current measure of the company's progress at the patent office. The company must ensure its arguments are perfectly tailored to the standards of JITESH PATEL to secure its intellectual property.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, JITESH | 1 | 78.8% | +12.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19638358 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING COMPUTER-SIMULATED REALITY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN USERS AND PUBLICATIONS USING LOCATION BASED SERVICES | PATEL, JITESH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19638358 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING COMPUTER-SIMULATED REALITY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN USERS AND PUBLICATIONS USING LOCATION BASED SERVICES | PATEL, JITESH | 2612 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2026 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial