Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, showing the technical focus for the company's current intellectual property. The 1 pending office action represents the current workload for the firm at the patent office.
The portfolio is managed by 1 distinct examiner, centralizing the prosecution effort. KUCAB, JAMIE R is the busiest examiner for this applicant, currently handling 1 pending office action. This shows that the assigned individual is responsible for the company's active prosecution, providing a singular point of review for the pending application.
The concentration of the 1 pending office action within 1 distinct art unit under 1 distinct examiner suggests that the prosecution strategy should be tailored to the specific review style of KUCAB, JAMIE R. Success in this matter depends on effectively addressing the concerns raised by the examiner involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUCAB, JAMIE R | 1 | 67.2% | +36.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19052983 | SHARE-TO-PAY E-COMMERCE SOLUTION | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 7d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19052983 | SHARE-TO-PAY E-COMMERCE SOLUTION | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 7d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19052983 | SHARE-TO-PAY E-COMMERCE SOLUTION | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 3699 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Feb 13, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial