Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Acell Industries Limited manages a portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 2 pending office actions. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. The prosecution activity is spread across 2 distinct art units, showing that the 2 pending office actions are being handled by separate technical divisions within the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for Acell Industries Limited is GOLDEN, CHINESSA T, who has 1 pending office action. This 1 action represents a portion of the 2 total pending office actions for the company. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending actions, the company faces multiple examiner perspectives relative to the count of active cases. This distribution requires the applicant to address the specific requirements of 2 different art units simultaneously. The 2 distinct examiners ensure that no single person oversees all pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDEN, CHINESSA T | 1 | 57.9% | +4.8% |
| BUTCHER, ROBERT T | 1 | 71.1% | +17.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16618647 | PHENOLIC MOULDING MATERIAL | BUTCHER, ROBERT T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1788 | 1 |
| 1764 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18775061 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING CURED POLYMERIC SKINS | GOLDEN, CHINESSA T | 1788 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Jul 17, 2024 |
| 16618647 | PHENOLIC MOULDING MATERIAL | BUTCHER, ROBERT T | 1764 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 02, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial