Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 45 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (40%) |
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUI, WEI YUN | 1 | 54.9% | +43.2% |
| KIM, JUNG W | 1 | 47.7% | +16.8% |
| VU, TAYLOR P | 1 | 72.7% | +13.6% |
| LIPMAN, JACOB | 1 | 83.3% | +12.5% |
| BAHL, SANGEETA | 1 | 20.5% | +19.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18186381 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR IN INTERNET-OF-THINGS (IOT) DEVICES | LIPMAN, JACOB | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18193397 | ENUMERATION ATTACK PREDICTION | VU, TAYLOR P | 53d |
| 17892299 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS | BAHL, SANGEETA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18647457 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMUTABILITY ASSURANCE OF BACKUP DATA BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE THREAT DETECTION | KIM, JUNG W | 30d overdue |
| 18193397 | ENUMERATION ATTACK PREDICTION | VU, TAYLOR P | 53d |
| 18753512 | DECLARATIVE ENRICHMENT OF USER-DEFINED WORKFLOWS | MUI, WEI YUN | — |
| 18186381 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR IN INTERNET-OF-THINGS (IOT) DEVICES | LIPMAN, JACOB | — |
| 17892299 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS | BAHL, SANGEETA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2191 | 1 |
| 2494 | 1 |
| 2437 | 1 |
| 2434 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18753512 | DECLARATIVE ENRICHMENT OF USER-DEFINED WORKFLOWS | MUI, WEI YUN | 2191 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 25, 2024 |
| 18647457 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMUTABILITY ASSURANCE OF BACKUP DATA BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE THREAT DETECTION | KIM, JUNG W | 2494 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 18193397 | ENUMERATION ATTACK PREDICTION | VU, TAYLOR P | 2437 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 53d | Pending | Mar 30, 2023 |
| 18186381 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR IN INTERNET-OF-THINGS (IOT) DEVICES | LIPMAN, JACOB | 2434 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2023 |
| 17892299 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS | BAHL, SANGEETA | 3626 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial