Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Acronis International GmbH

8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 49 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
8
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only8 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
75% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIM, JUNG W 1 47.4% +15.2%
JAKOVAC, RYAN J 1 65.7% +17.5%
TABOR, AMARE F 1 82.8% +23.0%
GEE, JASON KAI YIN 1 77.9% +23.2%
VU, TAYLOR P 1 75.9% +13.3%
RIGGINS, ARI FAITH COLEMA 1 66.7% +100.0%
BAHL, SANGEETA 1 20.5% +19.1%
ELLIOTT, JORDAN MCKENZIE 1 42.9% -11.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18477040 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIDDEN DATA TRANSFER TABOR, AMARE F 41d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17892299 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS BAHL, SANGEETA

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647457 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMUTABILITY ASSURANCE OF BACKUP DATA BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE THREAT DETECTION KIM, JUNG W 30d overdue
18469083 PROTECTING SENSITIVE DATA USED BY LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS GEE, JASON KAI YIN 27d
18613992 HARDWARE ANOMALY DETECTION WITH A CONFIDENCE BAND BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTING AN ISOLATION FOREST ALGORITHM JAKOVAC, RYAN J 29d
18477040 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIDDEN DATA TRANSFER TABOR, AMARE F 41d
18193397 ENUMERATION ATTACK PREDICTION VU, TAYLOR P 53d
18159164 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVISIONING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESOURCES RIGGINS, ARI FAITH COLEMA 56d
17892299 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS BAHL, SANGEETA

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2494 1
2445 1
2434 1
2495 1
2437 1
2197 1
3626 1
2666 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18647457 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMUTABILITY ASSURANCE OF BACKUP DATA BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE THREAT DETECTION KIM, JUNG W 2494 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Apr 26, 2024
18613992 HARDWARE ANOMALY DETECTION WITH A CONFIDENCE BAND BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTING AN ISOLATION FOREST ALGORITHM JAKOVAC, RYAN J 2445 §103 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Mar 22, 2024
18477040 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIDDEN DATA TRANSFER TABOR, AMARE F 2434 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Sep 28, 2023
18469083 PROTECTING SENSITIVE DATA USED BY LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS GEE, JASON KAI YIN 2495 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Sep 18, 2023
18193397 ENUMERATION ATTACK PREDICTION VU, TAYLOR P 2437 §103 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Mar 30, 2023
18159164 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVISIONING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESOURCES RIGGINS, ARI FAITH COLEMA 2197 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Jan 25, 2023
17892299 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROVISIONING BASED ON CONTRACTS BAHL, SANGEETA 3626 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 22, 2022
17842870 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COLOR-BASED OUTFIT CLASSIFICATION ELLIOTT, JORDAN MCKENZIE 2666 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Acronis International GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month