Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Acute Ideas Co. Ltd. currently manages a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio has 1 pending office action, which represents the total active workload for the company at this time. This 1 action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES. The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus within the broader medical and mechanical sectors. The busiest examiner, OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES, is responsible for 1 pending action, which is the entirety of the pending actions for the portfolio.
The presence of only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company is not currently facing a fragmented prosecution landscape. Instead, the company can focus its resources on the specific examination style of OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the outcome of this 1 matter is the primary driver for the current state of the portfolio. Practitioners should monitor the progress within this 1 distinct art unit to understand the company's immediate patenting trajectory in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | 1 | 78.5% | +11.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18467824 | BREAST MILK COLLECTION DEVICE | OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18467824 | BREAST MILK COLLECTION DEVICE | OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Sep 15, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial