Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Adp Inc.

21 pending office actions • 16 art units • 20 examiners • 0 of 21 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 55 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

21
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 21 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

9
Overdue
3
Due this week
3
Due this month
5
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 21 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (9)Due ≤ 7 days (3)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (5)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (33%)
12
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
2
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only7 (33%)
§103 only12 (57%)
No statute on record2 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
24% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
15
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

210 h
Manual time on pending OAs
42 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
74 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 2 18.6% +28.6%
BIBBEE, JARED M 1 80.3% +13.6%
EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 1 64.1% +57.8%
HAIDER, FAWAAD 1 49.8% +25.4%
OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P 1 66.4% +29.8%
SPAR, ILANA L 1 45.3% +28.4%
NGUYEN, TIEN C 1 68.2% +18.0%
SENSENIG, SHAUN D 1 14.5% +16.6%
VO, QUANG N 1 72.0% +8.3%
NGUYEN, NGA B 1 53.2% +24.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19245897 PREDICTION OF CACHEABLE QUERIES BIBBEE, JARED M 34d

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18200461 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF EMPLOYER-PROVIDED BENEFIT PLANS POLLOCK, GREGORY A 74d overdue
18642485 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF CUSTOMER DEMAND PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 36d overdue
17813444 SYSTEM FOR CUSTOMER CHURN PREDICTION AND PREVENTION KIM, PATRICK 31d overdue
17690527 PREDICTING AND INDEXING INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS KNIGHT, LETORIA G 23d overdue
18496434 TAX CLIENT EXIT PREDICTOR TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 4d overdue
18886608 DYNAMIC ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE MODEL HAIDER, FAWAAD 7d
18605533 GLOBAL PREDICTIVE MODELING VIA CUSTOM MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, NGA B 9d
18132805 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF TIME RECORD EVENTS PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 29d

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18752606 BENEFIT VALIDATION NGUYEN, TIEN C 46d overdue
18760572 OPERATION MODIFICATION TO ADDRESS INCOMPATIBILITY VIA MACHINE LEARNING SPAR, ILANA L 45d overdue
18642485 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF CUSTOMER DEMAND PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 36d overdue
18886608 DYNAMIC ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE MODEL HAIDER, FAWAAD 7d
18605533 GLOBAL PREDICTIVE MODELING VIA CUSTOM MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, NGA B 9d
18132805 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF TIME RECORD EVENTS PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 29d
19245897 PREDICTION OF CACHEABLE QUERIES BIBBEE, JARED M 34d
18828948 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GRAPH MODEL COMPUTING OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P 42d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 3
3625 3
3624 2
2161 1
3693 1
3627 1
3622 1
3694 1
2683 1
2433 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19245897 PREDICTION OF CACHEABLE QUERIES BIBBEE, JARED M 2161 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jun 23, 2025
18957342 CLASSIFYING TRANSACTIONS IN A WEB SERVICE ENVIRONMENT EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 3693 §103 Final Rejection 43d Pending Nov 22, 2024
18886608 DYNAMIC ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE MODEL HAIDER, FAWAAD 3627 §101 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Sep 16, 2024
18828948 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GRAPH MODEL COMPUTING OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P 3629 §103 Non-Final OA 42d Pending Sep 09, 2024
18760572 OPERATION MODIFICATION TO ADDRESS INCOMPATIBILITY VIA MACHINE LEARNING SPAR, ILANA L 3622 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Jul 01, 2024
18752606 BENEFIT VALIDATION NGUYEN, TIEN C 3694 Other Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Jun 24, 2024
18737776 SMART ACTIONS IN APPLICATION ECOSYSTEM SENSENIG, SHAUN D 3629 §103 Non-Final OA 42d Pending Jun 07, 2024
18642485 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF CUSTOMER DEMAND PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 3624 Other Non-Final OA 36d overdue Pending Apr 22, 2024
18630856 ATTENTION EMBEDDED TRANSFORMER NETWORK DRIVEN DOCUMENT DATA EXTRACTION VO, QUANG N 2683 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Apr 09, 2024
18605533 GLOBAL PREDICTIVE MODELING VIA CUSTOM MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, NGA B 3625 §101 Final Rejection 9d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18506787 DIGITAL CAREER COACH RUSS, COREY V 3629 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Nov 10, 2023
18496434 TAX CLIENT EXIT PREDICTOR TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 3625 §101 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Oct 27, 2023
18491526 MULTIPLE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE PLATFORM SHAAWAT, MAYASA A. 2433 §103 Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Oct 20, 2023
18479769 PREDICTIVE MODELING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMICALLY QUANTIFYING EMPLOYEE GROWTH OPPORTUNITY BOSWELL, BETH V 3625 §103 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Oct 02, 2023
18479737 SPARSE INTENT CLUSTERING THROUGH DEEP CONTEXT ENCODERS NGUYEN, LOAN T 2165 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Oct 02, 2023
18475800 METADATA DRIVEN PLATFORM FOR CUSTOMIZED APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NGUYEN, MONGBAO 2192 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Sep 27, 2023
18200461 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF EMPLOYER-PROVIDED BENEFIT PLANS POLLOCK, GREGORY A 3691 §101 Non-Final OA 74d overdue Pending May 22, 2023
18132805 MULTI-TASK DEEP LEARNING OF TIME RECORD EVENTS PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE 3624 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending Apr 10, 2023
17984350 MACHINE LEARNING BASED CODE MAPPING SACKALOSKY, COREY MATTHEW 2128 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 10, 2022
17813444 SYSTEM FOR CUSTOMER CHURN PREDICTION AND PREVENTION KIM, PATRICK 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2022
17690527 PREDICTING AND INDEXING INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS KNIGHT, LETORIA G 3623 §101 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Mar 09, 2022

Managing Adp Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month