Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Advanced Bionics AG

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 2 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Advanced Bionics AG manages 10 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are concentrated within 2 distinct art units, suggesting a focused technical scope for the company's current prosecution efforts despite the volume of filings. Having 10 pending office actions across only 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's technology frequently falls into specific examination categories.

The portfolio involves 10 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 10 pending office actions is assigned to a different official. JOSEPH M DIETRICH is the busiest examiner, though they are responsible for only 1 pending office action. This high number of 10 distinct examiners relative to the 2 distinct art units indicates that while the technology is concentrated, the company must navigate many different examiner perspectives. Practitioners should note that even within the 2 distinct art units, there is no examiner overlap, requiring unique strategies for each of the 10 pending office actions. Success in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector will require managing 10 separate examiner relationships.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (44%)
4
Medium (44%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only3 (33%)
§102 only1 (11%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
89% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 80.8% +8.6%
EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 1 70.4% +34.9%
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 1 34.0% +33.2%
FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 1 27.8% +40.4%
HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 1 27.3% +33.9%
WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 1 68.0% +28.7%
PORTER, JR, GARY A 1 68.8% +25.2%
SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 1 83.8% +8.1%
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 1 55.6% +46.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18986129 SCALAR TRANSLOCATION DETECTION FOR AN ELECTRODE LEAD OF A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM DIETRICH, JOSEPH M —
18718210 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COCHLEAR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT DURING AN ELECTRODE LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 12d
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER —
18738593 CASE FOR USE IN IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEMS AND IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEM EXTERNAL COMPONENT INCLUDING THE SAME PORTER, JR, GARY A —
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE WELCH, WILLOW GRACE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18718422 COCHLEAR IMPLANTS HAVING MRI-COMPATIBLE MAGNET APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 3d overdue
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 12d
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d
18678686 DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A PROCEDURE ASSOCIATED WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT —
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER —
18738593 CASE FOR USE IN IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEMS AND IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEM EXTERNAL COMPONENT INCLUDING THE SAME PORTER, JR, GARY A —
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE WELCH, WILLOW GRACE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 5
3792 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18986129 SCALAR TRANSLOCATION DETECTION FOR AN ELECTRODE LEAD OF A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM DIETRICH, JOSEPH M — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18678686 DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A PROCEDURE ASSOCIATED WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 3792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 30, 2024
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §101§103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Jul 21, 2022
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 3796 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Jun 29, 2022
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3796 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18718422 COCHLEAR IMPLANTS HAVING MRI-COMPATIBLE MAGNET APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 3792 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Jun 10, 2024
18738593 CASE FOR USE IN IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEMS AND IMPLANTABLE COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEM EXTERNAL COMPONENT INCLUDING THE SAME PORTER, JR, GARY A 3796 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18718210 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COCHLEAR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT DURING AN ELECTRODE LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 3796 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 3792 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2024

Managing Advanced Bionics AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month