Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aegis 11 S A has 2 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. Both of these actions are being handled by 1 distinct examiner, STCLAIR, ANDREW D. Furthermore, the entirety of the current prosecution is located within 1 distinct art unit.
STCLAIR, ANDREW D is the busiest examiner with 2 pending cases, which represents the company's active office actions. This concentration in the art unit and under the examiner means that the outcome of the pending office actions will likely be influenced by the same individual's interpretation. Practitioners should focus on the specific preferences of this examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 2 | 60.2% | +25.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17846060 | Method and Apparatus for Transmitting System Parameters of Soft Access Device, Device and Medium | STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 381d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17900859 | Method, Apparatus and Device for Negotiating Traffic-to-link Mapping Configuration and Storage Medium | STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 483d overdue |
| 17846060 | Method and Apparatus for Transmitting System Parameters of Soft Access Device, Device and Medium | STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 381d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2178 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17900859 | Method, Apparatus and Device for Negotiating Traffic-to-link Mapping Configuration and Storage Medium | STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 2178 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 483d overdue | Pending | Aug 31, 2022 |
| 17846060 | Method and Apparatus for Transmitting System Parameters of Soft Access Device, Device and Medium | STCLAIR, ANDREW D | 2178 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 381d overdue | Pending | Jun 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial