Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aegros Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit. This structure represents a concentrated prosecution profile where the company's current interaction with the USPTO is limited to a single technical focus and a single point of contact. The lack of diversity in examiners and art units simplifies the administrative overhead of tracking the company's intellectual property within Chemistry & Materials.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DEES, NIKKI H, who is handling 1 pending office action. Because the total count of pending work is limited to this single action, DEES, NIKKI H is the sole examiner currently reviewing the company's applications. This creates a straightforward prosecution environment where the applicant's primary objective is to satisfy the specific requirements of this individual examiner. Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific examination practices and precedents of this individual within their assigned art unit.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the pending application is focused on a specific area of technology. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for the varying standards of different USPTO divisions. The entire current pending portfolio is subject to the rules and examination culture of this unit, allowing for a targeted and consistent legal approach. This concentration of effort can lead to a more efficient path toward patent allowance for the company's current filing.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEES, NIKKI H | 1 | 22.0% | +20.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18264272 | SINGLE PASS ELECTRO-SEPARATION SYSTEM | DEES, NIKKI H | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18264272 | SINGLE PASS ELECTRO-SEPARATION SYSTEM | DEES, NIKKI H | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18264272 | SINGLE PASS ELECTRO-SEPARATION SYSTEM | DEES, NIKKI H | 1791 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAegros Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Nikki H Dees has the most, with 1 of Aegros Pty Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
