Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aising Ltd. is managing 5 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the company's software filings cover several different technical classifications. The workload is further spread among 5 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution suggests a broad research and development strategy that touches multiple specialized areas of computing.
KWON, JUN is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that no single examiner is overwhelmed by the company's current filings, as the 5 pending office actions are spread among 5 distinct examiners. Practitioners should note that the 3 distinct art units may require different strategies for overcoming technical rejections in the computing domain. The distribution of pending matters across 5 distinct examiners ensures that each application receives independent consideration. This variety of examiners and art units provides the company with a broad range of feedback from the USPTO on its software innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (60%) |
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KWON, JUN | 1 | 41.0% | +47.2% |
| TRIEU, EM N | 1 | 45.9% | +14.3% |
| BARRETT, RYAN S | 1 | 65.5% | +41.2% |
| ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| HAN, JOSEP | 1 | 45.8% | -0.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18034981 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 9d |
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | — |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | — |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | — |
| 17925864 | CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | HAN, JOSEP | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | — |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | — |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2148 | 1 |
| 2123 | 1 |
| 2122 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | — | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2024 |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | 2148 | §101§102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
| 18034981 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 2123 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | May 02, 2023 |
| 17925864 | CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | HAN, JOSEP | 2122 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 17, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial