Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 0 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aistorm Inc. has 4 pending office actions currently active. These actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is handled by a different individual. There are 0 distinct art units listed for these current proceedings.
ELCHANTI, ZEINA is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. This represents one of the 4 total pending office actions currently active. Because the pending actions are split between 4 distinct examiners, the workload is distributed across the identified personnel. Practitioners must manage 4 separate examiner relationships, as no single examiner oversees the entire portfolio. The presence of 0 art units indicates the administrative classification of these filings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| §112 only | 2 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEATON, SHERROD L | 1 | 53.3% | +35.7% |
| CHEN, SIBIN | 1 | 86.6% | +5.2% |
| ELCHANTI, ZEINA | 1 | 64.3% | +25.0% |
| MILLER, ALAN S | 1 | 70.6% | +26.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18759833 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | CHEN, SIBIN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18759840 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18759838 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | KEATON, SHERROD L | — |
| 18759840 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — |
| 18759464 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | MILLER, ALAN S | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18759838 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | KEATON, SHERROD L | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 29, 2024 |
| 18759833 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | CHEN, SIBIN | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 29, 2024 |
| 18759840 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 29, 2024 |
| 18759464 | CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR | MILLER, ALAN S | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial