Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Albright Product Design Limited is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Both of these actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which implies a consistent technical focus for the company's active applications. This centralization allows the prosecution team to apply a unified strategy when addressing the specific standards of that art unit.
The 2 pending office actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is reviewing one application. MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 pending action. This distribution ensures that the company's progress is not dependent on a single examiner's schedule, as the workload is shared equally between the 2 distinct examiners.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit for both 2 pending office actions suggests that the company's innovations in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems are closely related. While MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD and the other examiner each have 1 pending action, the shared art unit context may lead to similar prior art citations or procedural requirements across the two cases. This structure provides a balance between examiner diversity and technical consistency.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 1 | 63.4% | +27.5% |
| PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG | 1 | 77.7% | +12.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18375040 | DEPLOYABLE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINT | PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18843779 | CABLE REEL ASSEMBLY | MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 2d overdue |
| 18375040 | DEPLOYABLE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINT | PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18843779 | CABLE REEL ASSEMBLY | MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 3654 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Sep 04, 2024 |
| 18375040 | DEPLOYABLE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINT | PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial