Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aliro Technologies Inc. currently has 1 pending office action under review. This single case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, specifically DINH, PAUL. Because the data shows 0 distinct art units, the organizational placement of this filing within the patent office structure is not currently categorized in this dataset. The 1 pending office action assigned to DINH, PAUL accounts for the entirety of the company's active prosecution pipeline.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio, DINH, PAUL, holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this individual to resolve the outstanding issue. With 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on a single review. Successfully clearing the case requires a direct and focused response to the assigned official. The presence of 0 distinct art units suggests a unique administrative situation for the application. Resolving the 1 busiest examiner pending case will depend on the specific dialogue with the examiner. The company must ensure that its 1 distinct examiner receives all necessary technical documentation to move the 1 pending office action forward.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DINH, PAUL | 1 | 89.5% | +4.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18545225 | OPERATING A LAYERED QUANTUM NETWORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH A CONTROLLER | DINH, PAUL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2851 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18545225 | OPERATING A LAYERED QUANTUM NETWORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH A CONTROLLER | DINH, PAUL | 2851 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAliro Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Paul Dinh has the most, with 1 of Aliro Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.