Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Almendra Pte. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Almendra Pte. Ltd. is navigating 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are spread across 2 distinct art units, showing a consistent presence in specific technical classifications. The company interacts with 2 distinct examiners during this phase of prosecution, which suggests a concentrated pool of feedback from the patent office. This concentration requires a strategic approach to maintain consistency in arguments across the 4 pending office actions.

KERSHAW, KELLY P is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding a portion of the workload. This concentration means that a significant portion of the company's current office actions are under the review of a particular individual. Practitioners should note this examiner's influence on the portfolio's overall progress. Managing the distinct art units while dealing with the assigned examiners indicates that the officials may have overlapping technical expertise relevant to the Chemistry & Materials field. This approach ensures that the specific nuances of the technical field are addressed consistently.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KERSHAW, KELLY P 2 17.7% +16.0%
LI, CHANGQING 2 29.3% +33.6%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18377913 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P 147d overdue
18285356 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 4d overdue
18640711 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 70d
18676083 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18377913 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P 147d overdue
18285356 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 4d overdue
18640711 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 70d
18676083 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 3
1792 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18676083 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P 1792 §103§112DPOther Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2024
18640711 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 1791 §102§112DPOther Non-Final OA 70d Pending Apr 19, 2024
18377913 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §102§103DP Final Rejection 147d overdue Pending Oct 09, 2023
18285356 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY LI, CHANGQING 1791 §103§112DP Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Oct 02, 2023

Managing Almendra Pte. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month