Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (20%) |
| No statute on record | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LI, CHANGQING | 2 | 30.0% | +34.0% |
| SWEENEY, MAURA ELIZABETH | 2 | 2.2% | -2.8% |
| KERSHAW, KELLY P | 1 | 17.7% | +16.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18377913 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | KERSHAW, KELLY P | 147d overdue |
| 18377803 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | SWEENEY, MAURA ELIZABETH | 8d overdue |
| 17406939 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | SWEENEY, MAURA ELIZABETH | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18377913 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | KERSHAW, KELLY P | 147d overdue |
| 18285356 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | LI, CHANGQING | 4d overdue |
| 18640711 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | LI, CHANGQING | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1791 | 5 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18640711 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | LI, CHANGQING | 1791 | DPOther | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
| 18377913 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | KERSHAW, KELLY P | 1791 | Other | Non-Final OA | 147d overdue | Pending | Oct 09, 2023 |
| 18377803 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | SWEENEY, MAURA ELIZABETH | 1791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Oct 08, 2023 |
| 18285356 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | LI, CHANGQING | 1791 | Other | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Oct 02, 2023 |
| 17406939 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED TASTE QUALITY | SWEENEY, MAURA ELIZABETH | 1791 | §112 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Aug 19, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial