Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Altek Biotechnology Corporation

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, ANDREW H 1 75.1% +42.5%
KASTURE, DNYANESH G 1 48.5% +27.4%
NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO 1 69.6% +23.2%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17844038 DRIVING MECHANISM FOR DRIVING A PLUNGER OF AN AUTO-INJECTOR TO SLIDE RELATIVE TO A RESERVOIR OF THE AUTO-INJECTOR AND AUTO-INJECTOR THEREWITH NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO 84d overdue
18499243 PERISTALTIC PUMP DEVICE AND FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM THEREOF KASTURE, DNYANESH G 72d overdue
18399720 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE NGUYEN, ANDREW H 9d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3741 1
3746 1
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18399720 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE NGUYEN, ANDREW H 3741 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Dec 29, 2023
18499243 PERISTALTIC PUMP DEVICE AND FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM THEREOF KASTURE, DNYANESH G 3746 §103 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Nov 01, 2023
17844038 DRIVING MECHANISM FOR DRIVING A PLUNGER OF AN AUTO-INJECTOR TO SLIDE RELATIVE TO A RESERVOIR OF THE AUTO-INJECTOR AND AUTO-INJECTOR THEREWITH NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO 3783 §103 Final Rejection 84d overdue Pending Jun 19, 2022

Managing Altek Biotechnology Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month