Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ami International Sapi De C V has 2 pending office actions currently under review. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, with LAU, TUNG S identified as the busiest examiner. LAU, TUNG S is responsible for 1 pending office action, while the other examiner handles the remaining matter.
The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with these pending office actions. This suggests that the actions may be in a specific administrative state. With multiple examiners involved, the company is receiving feedback from different individuals, which provides more than one perspective on the patentability of their claims.
Because the busiest examiner manages 1 pending office action, the workload is split between the two examiners. Practitioners should monitor the matters closely, as the 0 distinct art units may impact the procedural timeline. The involvement of 2 distinct examiners ensures that the prosecution of the 2 pending office actions is not dependent on a single person's discretion.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAU, TUNG S | 1 | 83.0% | +14.5% |
| TRAN, TIFFANY T | 1 | 59.4% | +48.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18381390 | Electrode Vibration Detection Module and Methods Thereof | LAU, TUNG S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18381390 | Electrode Vibration Detection Module and Methods Thereof | LAU, TUNG S | — |
| 18373672 | POWER SUPPLY FOR AN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE | TRAN, TIFFANY T | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18381390 | Electrode Vibration Detection Module and Methods Thereof | LAU, TUNG S | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 18, 2023 |
| 18373672 | POWER SUPPLY FOR AN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE | TRAN, TIFFANY T | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial