Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ampacet Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ampacet Corporation currently manages 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the company's active matters are limited to a single point of review.

The busiest examiner, INSLER, ELIZABETH, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the portfolio only contains 1 pending office action, this individual is the sole examiner currently reviewing the company's applications. This 1 pending office action represents the total active workload for the portfolio at this time.

The consolidation of the 1 pending office action into 1 distinct art unit under 1 distinct examiner simplifies the management of the portfolio. Practitioners should focus on the 1 pending office action managed by INSLER, ELIZABETH, as it is the only active matter. This structure avoids the complexity of coordinating across different technical units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
INSLER, ELIZABETH 1 66.9% +25.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18560071 FEEDSTOCK HOMOGENIZER WITH INTEGRATED SEPARATOR INSLER, ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18560071 FEEDSTOCK HOMOGENIZER WITH INTEGRATED SEPARATOR INSLER, ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18560071 FEEDSTOCK HOMOGENIZER WITH INTEGRATED SEPARATOR INSLER, ELIZABETH 1774 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 09, 2023

Managing Ampacet Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month