Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
AnaPass Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single matter is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for this application. The 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which means there is a direct and singular point of contact for this prosecution matter.
PIZIALI, JEFFREY J is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. As there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action in total, PIZIALI, JEFFREY J is responsible for the entirety of the current workload. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the prosecution is confined to a single specialized group within the patent office. This concentration of 1 pending office action with 1 distinct examiner in 1 art unit simplifies the communication required for this specific portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 1 | 42.6% | +5.5% |
| BOYD, JONATHAN A | 1 | 69.1% | +7.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222228 | SOURCE DRIVER AND DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SAME | PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 43d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2628 | 1 |
| 2627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19222228 | SOURCE DRIVER AND DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SAME | PIZIALI, JEFFREY J | 2628 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 43d overdue | Pending | May 29, 2025 |
| 19193055 | DISPLAY SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME | BOYD, JONATHAN A | 2627 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial