Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Anpec Electronics Corporation

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
§112 only2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
75% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAVALLARI, DANIEL 1 78.2% +14.1%
DINH, THAI T 1 85.8% -0.1%
LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S 1 76.6% +10.0%
TALIOUA, ABDELBASST 1 58.7% +34.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18659011 MOTOR ROTATIONAL SPEED LIMIT CIRCUIT DINH, THAI T 77d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18476325 SINGLE-WIRE MULTI-DEVICE CASCADE ADDRESSING SYSTEM TALIOUA, ABDELBASST 2d overdue
18657941 MOTOR DRIVER IMPROVING RESONANCE NOISE CAUSED BY MOTOR LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S 13d
18665579 SURGE SUPPRESSION PROTECTION CIRCUIT CAVALLARI, DANIEL 14d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2846 2
2836 1
2445 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18665579 SURGE SUPPRESSION PROTECTION CIRCUIT CAVALLARI, DANIEL 2836 §102 Non-Final OA 14d Pending May 16, 2024
18659011 MOTOR ROTATIONAL SPEED LIMIT CIRCUIT DINH, THAI T 2846 §112 Non-Final OA 77d Pending May 09, 2024
18657941 MOTOR DRIVER IMPROVING RESONANCE NOISE CAUSED BY MOTOR LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S 2846 §103 Non-Final OA 13d Pending May 08, 2024
18476325 SINGLE-WIRE MULTI-DEVICE CASCADE ADDRESSING SYSTEM TALIOUA, ABDELBASST 2445 §112 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2023

Managing Anpec Electronics Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month