Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Antithesis Foods Inc. is engaged in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This active matter is the only current engagement with the patent office for this portfolio.
The data shows that the prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's innovations are focused within a specific chemical niche. For a practitioner, this means there is no need to navigate different art unit cultures or conflicting examiner styles across the portfolio.
CHAWLA, JYOTI is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is the primary point of contact for the current active matter. Understanding this examiner's specific history and preferences is essential for a successful outcome.
The involvement of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit provides a stable environment for patent prosecution. The practitioner can develop a targeted strategy for the 1 pending office action without the complexity of managing multiple simultaneous deadlines. This centralized focus is a key aspect of the current prosecution landscape for Antithesis Foods Inc.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1 | 52.7% | +30.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18145831 | PRODUCTION OF LEGUME-BASED NUTRIENT-DENSE DOUGHS AND FOOD PRODUCTS | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18145831 | PRODUCTION OF LEGUME-BASED NUTRIENT-DENSE DOUGHS AND FOOD PRODUCTS | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial