Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Apb Corporation is currently managing a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area, which includes 3 pending office actions. These actions are being handled by 3 distinct examiners, indicating a diverse range of individual reviews. However, these examiners are situated within 2 distinct art units, suggesting that while the examiners differ, the technical divisions reviewing the applications are more concentrated.
The busiest examiner for Apb Corporation is GODO, OLATUNJI A, who is responsible for 1 pending action. This 1 pending action represents a portion of the total 3 pending office actions currently active for the company. The fact that each of the 3 distinct examiners has a similar workload, with the busiest only having 1 pending action, shows that the company's prosecution efforts are distributed across its current pipeline.
With 3 pending office actions spread across 2 distinct art units, the company is navigating multiple technical standards within the Chemistry & Materials field. The involvement of 3 distinct examiners provides a variety of perspectives on the company's filings. Practitioners should note that GODO, OLATUNJI A is just one of the 3 distinct examiners currently engaged, and the 1 pending action under this examiner is part of a broader 3-action workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GODO, OLATUNJI A | 1 | 85.9% | +9.0% |
| CHEN, NING | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| MURPHY, RYAN PATRICK | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573460 | BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND CLEAN ROOM STRUCTURE | GODO, OLATUNJI A | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18571722 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE COMPOSITION FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES | CHEN, NING | — |
| 18566995 | BATTERY PACK | MURPHY, RYAN PATRICK | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1752 | 2 |
| 1723 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18573460 | BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND CLEAN ROOM STRUCTURE | GODO, OLATUNJI A | 1752 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
| 18571722 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE COMPOSITION FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES | CHEN, NING | 1723 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
| 18566995 | BATTERY PACK | MURPHY, RYAN PATRICK | 1752 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialApb Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.
Olatunji A Godo has the most, with 1 of Apb Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
