Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Apb Corporation

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCNALLY, DANIEL 1 67.8% +13.4%
CREPEAU, JONATHAN 1 73.2% +18.1%
LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE 1 75.0% +32.3%
MELFI, OLIVIA MASON 1 68.6% +22.7%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17798174 Lithium-Ion Battery System and Battery State Estimation System LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE 84d overdue
18573466 BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD MCNALLY, DANIEL 70d overdue
17641069 Lithium-Ion Battery Module MELFI, OLIVIA MASON 5d overdue
18035447 LITHIUM-ION BATTERY MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD CREPEAU, JONATHAN 1d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1746 1
1725 1
1727 1
1729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18573466 BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND BATTERY ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD MCNALLY, DANIEL 1746 §112 Non-Final OA 70d overdue Pending Dec 22, 2023
18035447 LITHIUM-ION BATTERY MANUFACTURING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD CREPEAU, JONATHAN 1725 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending May 04, 2023
17798174 Lithium-Ion Battery System and Battery State Estimation System LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE 1727 §102 Final Rejection 84d overdue Pending Aug 08, 2022
17641069 Lithium-Ion Battery Module MELFI, OLIVIA MASON 1729 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2022

Managing Apb Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month