Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Applied Research Associates Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Applied Research Associates Inc. manages a company patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. The portfolio currently includes 5 pending office actions. These matters are distributed across 4 distinct art units. This wide distribution across art units suggests that the company's technical disclosures are diverse and touch upon several different specialized areas within the communications field. The presence of 5 pending office actions indicates an active period of engagement with the patent office.

The prosecution of these cases involves 5 distinct examiners. With 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, each matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This means there is no overlap in examiners across the 4 distinct art units. Applied Research Associates Inc. must navigate five separate prosecution tracks, each with its own set of examiner preferences and art unit norms. Practitioners should be prepared for a variety of procedural approaches.

BREIER, KRYSTINE E is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This accounts for one fifth of the 5 pending office actions currently active for the company. While BREIER, KRYSTINE E is the busiest, the workload is evenly spread, meaning no single examiner has a dominant influence over the portfolio's current trajectory.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
40% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BREIER, KRYSTINE E 1 82.3% +8.2%
LEE, BENJAMIN P 1 80.0% +17.0%
VU, KHOA 1 69.3% +13.9%
DOLETSKI, BLAINE G 1 75.0% +9.1%
GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 1 77.1% +23.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18921468 LASER SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P 28d
19013633 BLAST TRIANGULATION BREIER, KRYSTINE E —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18441891 HYDROTHERMAL REFINING PROCESS DOLETSKI, BLAINE G —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18439259 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING AN ACCURATE ENHANCED LUND AND BROWDER CHART AND TOTAL BODY SURFACE AREA BURN SCORE GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 22d
18921468 LASER SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P 28d
18674522 LARGE-SCALE ENVIRONMENT-MODELING WITH GEOMETRIC OPTIMIZATION VU, KHOA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3641 1
2611 1
1793 1
2677 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19013633 BLAST TRIANGULATION BREIER, KRYSTINE E — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
18921468 LASER SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P 3641 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Oct 21, 2024
18674522 LARGE-SCALE ENVIRONMENT-MODELING WITH GEOMETRIC OPTIMIZATION VU, KHOA 2611 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 24, 2024
18441891 HYDROTHERMAL REFINING PROCESS DOLETSKI, BLAINE G 1793 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2024
18439259 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING AN ACCURATE ENHANCED LUND AND BROWDER CHART AND TOTAL BODY SURFACE AREA BURN SCORE GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 2677 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Feb 12, 2024

Managing Applied Research Associates Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month