Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Arecor Limited

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
4
Unknown (80%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
No statute on record4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B 1 32.4% +21.6%
O'BRIEN, LEA S 1 50.0% +8.3%
D' AMBROSIO, THEA 1 55.6% +56.8%
MCCOLLUM, ANDREA K 1 60.7% +32.1%
LEE, JIA-HAI 1 50.1% +48.1%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17044729 MEDICAL INFUSION PUMP SYSTEM FOR THE DELIVERY OF AN INSULIN COMPOUND MCCOLLUM, ANDREA K 114d overdue
17416845 NOVEL COMPOSITION D' AMBROSIO, THEA 98d overdue
17916504 NOVEL FORMUATIONS RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B 50d overdue
16337730 NOVEL FORMULATIONS LEE, JIA-HAI 10d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1628 1
1646 1
1654 1
1674 1
1658 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17916504 NOVEL FORMUATIONS RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B 1628 Other Non-Final OA 50d overdue Pending Sep 30, 2022
17428341 STABILIZED Fc FUSION PROTEIN SOLUTIONS O'BRIEN, LEA S 1646 §103 Non-Final OA 176d overdue Pending Aug 04, 2021
17416845 NOVEL COMPOSITION D' AMBROSIO, THEA 1654 Other Non-Final OA 98d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2021
17044729 MEDICAL INFUSION PUMP SYSTEM FOR THE DELIVERY OF AN INSULIN COMPOUND MCCOLLUM, ANDREA K 1674 Other Final Rejection 114d overdue Pending Oct 01, 2020
16337730 NOVEL FORMULATIONS LEE, JIA-HAI 1658 Other Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2019

Managing Arecor Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month