Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Arelac, Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Arelac, Inc. is currently navigating 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, indicating that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. Despite the variety of examiners, the portfolio is situated within 2 distinct art units, suggesting some overlap in the technical classifications of the company's filings. This distribution requires the company to manage three different examination styles simultaneously.

WEISS, PAMELA HL is noted as the busiest examiner for Arelac, Inc., with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Given that there are 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending office actions, the workload is distributed such that each examiner handles 1 case. This requires the company to adapt to different examination styles within the Chemistry & Materials domain. The involvement of 2 distinct art units means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to the specific standards of each unit.

Practitioners should carefully monitor the 3 distinct examiners to identify any diverging interpretations of the company's material science innovations. While the 3 pending office actions are spread across 3 examiners, the concentration in 2 distinct art units may allow for some thematic consistency in the prior art cited. Maintaining a cohesive strategy across the 2 distinct art units is essential for a unified patent portfolio. The 1 pending office action assigned to Weiss represents a specific focus within this broader chemistry prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEISS, PAMELA HL 1 54.9% +45.9%
ZHANG, KELING NMN 1 66.8% +17.6%
CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1 41.1% +50.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18075768 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TREATMENT OF LIME TO FORM VATERITE ZHANG, KELING NMN 2d overdue
17963647 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR CEMENT BLENDS WITH REACTIVE VATERITE CASE, SARAH CATHERINE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18075768 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TREATMENT OF LIME TO FORM VATERITE ZHANG, KELING NMN 2d overdue
18085942 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS RELATED TO AGGREGATES WEISS, PAMELA HL 28d
17963647 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR CEMENT BLENDS WITH REACTIVE VATERITE CASE, SARAH CATHERINE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1732 2
1731 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18085942 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS RELATED TO AGGREGATES WEISS, PAMELA HL 1732 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Dec 21, 2022
18075768 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TREATMENT OF LIME TO FORM VATERITE ZHANG, KELING NMN 1732 §103§112 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2022
17963647 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR CEMENT BLENDS WITH REACTIVE VATERITE CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1731 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2022

Managing Arelac, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month