Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Armstrong World Industries Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Armstrong World Industries Inc. is currently managing 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are located in 2 distinct art units, which suggests a technical focus for the pending applications. The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 5 pending actions is assigned to a different individual.

The busiest examiner, COLLISTER, ELIZABETH A, is responsible for 1 busiest_examiner_pending action. This shows that the 5 pending office actions are spread across 5 distinct examiners without overlap. While the 2 distinct art units offer concentration in terms of patent office groups, the company must still address the requirements of 5 different examiners.

With 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the company's prosecution efforts are decentralized at the personnel level. The 2 distinct art units within the Chemistry & Materials sector represent the primary administrative environments for these 5 actions. This structure requires the company to maintain consistent positions across 5 distinct examiners while navigating 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
60% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COLLISTER, ELIZABETH A 1 81.5% +14.3%
GOLDEN, CHINESSA T 1 57.9% +4.8%
MUDD, HENRY HOOPER 1 69.9% +24.0%
FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1 78.4% +13.2%
HANDVILLE, BRIAN 1 51.4% +28.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989645 ANTIMICROBIAL BUILDING PANELS COLLISTER, ELIZABETH A —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17825101 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PRINTING UPON TEXTURED SURFACES OF BUILDING PANELS, AND METHODS THEREOF HANDVILLE, BRIAN 1d overdue
18866548 SURFACE COVERING SYSTEM MUDD, HENRY HOOPER —
18738763 COMPOSITE BUILDING PANEL FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17825101 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PRINTING UPON TEXTURED SURFACES OF BUILDING PANELS, AND METHODS THEREOF HANDVILLE, BRIAN 1d overdue
18989645 ANTIMICROBIAL BUILDING PANELS COLLISTER, ELIZABETH A —
18866548 SURFACE COVERING SYSTEM MUDD, HENRY HOOPER —
18738763 COMPOSITE BUILDING PANEL FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1781 1
1783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989645 ANTIMICROBIAL BUILDING PANELS COLLISTER, ELIZABETH A — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18988339 ANTIMICROBIAL BUILDING PANELS GOLDEN, CHINESSA T — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18866548 SURFACE COVERING SYSTEM MUDD, HENRY HOOPER — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2024
18738763 COMPOSITE BUILDING PANEL FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1781 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 10, 2024
17825101 SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR PRINTING UPON TEXTURED SURFACES OF BUILDING PANELS, AND METHODS THEREOF HANDVILLE, BRIAN 1783 §103§112 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending May 26, 2022

Managing Armstrong World Industries Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month