Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Artrya Limited has 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This level of concentration suggests that the company's current patent applications are closely related or part of a single technology family. Dealing with a single examiner for the entire pending portfolio allows for a consistent dialogue between the applicant and the patent office. This streamlined prosecution environment reduces the complexity often found in larger, more distributed portfolios.
The busiest examiner, ROSARIO, DENNIS, is responsible for 2 pending office actions. Because there is only a single examiner and a single art unit involved, the company's immediate success in the Communications sector relies on this individual's perspective. Practitioners can focus their preparation on the specific requirements of this individual and the standards of the 1 distinct art unit. This high degree of centralization means that the outcome of these specific cases will significantly impact the company's overall standing in the Communications field. The strategy requires a precise understanding of the examiner's past decisions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROSARIO, DENNIS | 2 | 68.7% | +29.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18292843 | A CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | 29d overdue |
| 18893958 | CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18292843 | A CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | 29d overdue |
| 18893958 | CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2676 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893958 | CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | — | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
| 18292843 | A CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | ROSARIO, DENNIS | 2676 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 29d overdue | Pending | Jan 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial