Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Asco L P

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Asco L P currently has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, which distributes the prosecution risk across different officials and ensures a variety of perspectives on the company's claims. The portfolio involves 2 distinct art units, reflecting a technical breadth that covers multiple mechanical or medical classifications within the USPTO.

Kevin F Murphy is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action currently assigned to him. Because there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the company's strategy must be adaptable to different examination styles and individual technical concerns. The use of 2 art units suggests that the company's innovations are being tested against different sets of technical prior art, requiring the applicant to manage separate tracks of classification standards.

The distribution of 3 pending actions among 3 distinct examiners allows the company to avoid a single point of failure in its prosecution efforts. However, the involvement of 2 distinct art units means that practitioners must be prepared for different technical requirements to be applied to the company's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering innovations. Successfully navigating this portfolio requires a coordinated approach that addresses the specific feedback from Kevin F Murphy and the other assigned examiners while maintaining a consistent technical narrative.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MURPHY, KEVIN F 1 67.8% +27.7%
RODAK, LEE E 1 72.2% +34.1%
KRCHA, MATTHEW D 1 64.7% +35.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066116 SOLENOID VALVE POPPET AFFIXMENT MURPHY, KEVIN F —
18933581 Device and Method for Anticipating Failure in a Solenoid Pilot Operated Control Valve for a Fieldbus Manifold Assembly RODAK, LEE E —
18516861 MODULAR MANIFOLD FOR USE WITH A MICROFLUIDICS CHIP AND HAVING TWO-WAY AND THREE-WAY PLATE MANIFOLDS AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME KRCHA, MATTHEW D —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066116 SOLENOID VALVE POPPET AFFIXMENT MURPHY, KEVIN F —
18933581 Device and Method for Anticipating Failure in a Solenoid Pilot Operated Control Valve for a Fieldbus Manifold Assembly RODAK, LEE E —
18516861 MODULAR MANIFOLD FOR USE WITH A MICROFLUIDICS CHIP AND HAVING TWO-WAY AND THREE-WAY PLATE MANIFOLDS AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME KRCHA, MATTHEW D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3753 1
1796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19066116 SOLENOID VALVE POPPET AFFIXMENT MURPHY, KEVIN F 3753 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18933581 Device and Method for Anticipating Failure in a Solenoid Pilot Operated Control Valve for a Fieldbus Manifold Assembly RODAK, LEE E — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18516861 MODULAR MANIFOLD FOR USE WITH A MICROFLUIDICS CHIP AND HAVING TWO-WAY AND THREE-WAY PLATE MANIFOLDS AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME KRCHA, MATTHEW D 1796 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 21, 2023

Managing Asco L P's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month