Technology area: Computing & Software
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Atos France has 6 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The docket involves 6 examiners across 5 art units, so examination responsibility is broadly distributed, while at least one art unit handles more than one matter.
IQBAL, MUSTAFA is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action. No examiner concentration is shown in the data, which makes individual response calendars and examiner-specific issue tracking important for maintaining consistency across the portfolio.
The combination of 6 actions and 5 art units suggests that prosecution management should distinguish examiner treatment from art-unit treatment. Counsel may benefit from identifying recurring claim or eligibility issues by art unit, while preserving separate response analysis for each examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (17%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (33%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 1 | 46.9% | +24.7% |
| SYED, FARHAN M | 1 | 75.1% | +23.2% |
| JACKSON, JORDAN L | 1 | 40.4% | +39.0% |
| LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | 1 | 75.0% | +11.9% |
| HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES | 1 | 75.0% | +25.8% |
| HANSEN, CONNOR LEVI | 1 | 72.7% | +38.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18896528 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASSIGNING TICKETS TO AGENTS | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | — |
| 18742520 | METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING A DECISION TREE FOR DIAGNOSING A SYSTEM, METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING THE SYSTEM, DEVICES AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS THEREOF | JACKSON, JORDAN L | — |
| 18735291 | METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A DATA PROCESSING CHAIN | LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | — |
| 18600982 | Method for configuring a data processing chain | HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18586690 | Method for assessing carbon capture of an area of interest | HANSEN, CONNOR LEVI | 7d |
| 18896528 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASSIGNING TICKETS TO AGENTS | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | — |
| 18887586 | DECISION INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR DECISION INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM | SYED, FARHAN M | — |
| 18742520 | METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING A DECISION TREE FOR DIAGNOSING A SYSTEM, METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING THE SYSTEM, DEVICES AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS THEREOF | JACKSON, JORDAN L | — |
| 18735291 | METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A DATA PROCESSING CHAIN | LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | — |
| 18600982 | Method for configuring a data processing chain | HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2142 | 2 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 2161 | 1 |
| 2857 | 1 |
| 2672 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18896528 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASSIGNING TICKETS TO AGENTS | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 25, 2024 |
| 18887586 | DECISION INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR DECISION INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM | SYED, FARHAN M | 2161 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 17, 2024 |
| 18742520 | METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING A DECISION TREE FOR DIAGNOSING A SYSTEM, METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING THE SYSTEM, DEVICES AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS THEREOF | JACKSON, JORDAN L | 2857 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 13, 2024 |
| 18735291 | METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A DATA PROCESSING CHAIN | LANE, THOMAS BERNARD | 2142 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 06, 2024 |
| 18600982 | Method for configuring a data processing chain | HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES | 2142 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 11, 2024 |
| 18586690 | Method for assessing carbon capture of an area of interest | HANSEN, CONNOR LEVI | 2672 | §103 | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Feb 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAtos France has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.
Mustafa Iqbal has the most, with 1 of Atos France's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
