Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Atr Brands Limited maintains a company patent portfolio currently concentrated within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio shows a centralized prosecution structure, as evidenced by the 1 pending office action currently active. This 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's immediate patent hurdles, suggesting a specific engagement with the patent office in this technical field.
The prosecution landscape for this entity is narrow, involving only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated footprint indicates that the company's intellectual property strategy is currently limited to a single technical niche. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter has not yet branched out into multi-disciplinary categories, keeping the administrative path focused for the applicant.
TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because this examiner is the only 1 listed for the portfolio, their individual examination style and history will be the primary factor in the success of the current prosecution cycle. Practitioners should focus on this specific examiner's past behavior within the 1 art unit involved to navigate the pending action effectively, as the busiest examiner pending count is 1.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 1 | 39.0% | +46.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19103139 | SUITCASE FRAME | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19103139 | SUITCASE FRAME | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3733 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19103139 | SUITCASE FRAME | TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI | 3733 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 16d | Pending | Feb 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial