Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ats Automation Tooling Systems Inc.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ats Automation Tooling Systems Inc. has 4 pending office actions in its portfolio. These actions are categorized under the technology area of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The workload is divided among 4 distinct examiners, which indicates that no single examiner is handling multiple pending matters for the company at this time. This distribution ensures that the prosecution of each application is independent of the others.

The prosecution is further diversified across a matching count of 4 distinct art units. This alignment between the number of pending office actions and the number of art units shows that each filing is being processed in a unique administrative environment. For a portfolio with this many pending office actions, this level of variety suggests that the company's innovations in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems span several different technical niches.

MACFARLANE, EVAN H is listed as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This individual is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 4 pending office actions in total, this busiest examiner is responsible for a portion of the pending workload. This distribution across various examiners and art units requires a broad strategy to manage the different examination styles encountered. Practitioners must track 1 busiest examiner pending action while addressing the other three matters separately.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACFARLANE, EVAN H 1 50.7% +42.2%
TON, TRI T 1 86.1% +10.5%
HARP, WILLIAM RAY 1 79.1% +10.8%
HATCHER, DEIRDRE D 1 28.1% +24.2%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17710129 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING POWER TO A MOVING ELEMENT ON A CONVEYOR AND ACCESSORY DRIVEN BY POWER PROVIDED TO A MOVING ELEMENT HARP, WILLIAM RAY 72d overdue
17120343 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT HATCHER, DEIRDRE D 50d overdue
18845417 REACTOR VESSEL CUTTING DEVICE AND METHOD MACFARLANE, EVAN H —
18463660 PARTICLE INSPECTION FOR LIQUID CONTAINERS TON, TRI T —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17710129 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING POWER TO A MOVING ELEMENT ON A CONVEYOR AND ACCESSORY DRIVEN BY POWER PROVIDED TO A MOVING ELEMENT HARP, WILLIAM RAY 72d overdue
17120343 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT HATCHER, DEIRDRE D 50d overdue
18845417 REACTOR VESSEL CUTTING DEVICE AND METHOD MACFARLANE, EVAN H —
18463660 PARTICLE INSPECTION FOR LIQUID CONTAINERS TON, TRI T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3724 1
2877 1
3653 1
3625 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18845417 REACTOR VESSEL CUTTING DEVICE AND METHOD MACFARLANE, EVAN H 3724 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18463660 PARTICLE INSPECTION FOR LIQUID CONTAINERS TON, TRI T 2877 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 08, 2023
17710129 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING POWER TO A MOVING ELEMENT ON A CONVEYOR AND ACCESSORY DRIVEN BY POWER PROVIDED TO A MOVING ELEMENT HARP, WILLIAM RAY 3653 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Mar 31, 2022
17120343 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT HATCHER, DEIRDRE D 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 50d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2020

Managing Ats Automation Tooling Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month