Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKRZYCKI, JONATHAN MICHAEL | 1 | 66.8% | +33.0% |
| CHIN, PAUL T | 1 | 71.6% | +15.3% |
| HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 1 | 79.0% | +10.6% |
| HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 1 | 27.2% | +24.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17120343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT | HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 50d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17710129 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING POWER TO A MOVING ELEMENT ON A CONVEYOR AND ACCESSORY DRIVEN BY POWER PROVIDED TO A MOVING ELEMENT | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 72d overdue |
| 17894846 | HIGH-FLEXIBILITY GRIPPER | CHIN, PAUL T | 71d overdue |
| 17120343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT | HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 50d overdue |
| 17991934 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS WITH SYNCHRONOUS ELEMENTS | SKRZYCKI, JONATHAN MICHAEL | 30d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2116 | 1 |
| 3654 | 1 |
| 3653 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17991934 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS WITH SYNCHRONOUS ELEMENTS | SKRZYCKI, JONATHAN MICHAEL | 2116 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Nov 22, 2022 |
| 17894846 | HIGH-FLEXIBILITY GRIPPER | CHIN, PAUL T | 3654 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 71d overdue | Pending | Aug 24, 2022 |
| 17710129 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING POWER TO A MOVING ELEMENT ON A CONVEYOR AND ACCESSORY DRIVEN BY POWER PROVIDED TO A MOVING ELEMENT | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 3653 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 72d overdue | Pending | Mar 31, 2022 |
| 17120343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT | HATCHER, DEIRDRE D | 3625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Dec 14, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial