Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Audio Pixels Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio that is currently facing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action represents the total active workload for the company at the patent office. The data reports 0 distinct art units, indicating that the pending matter is not currently distributed across different technical divisions of the office.
The review is conducted by 1 distinct examiner, which concentrates the prosecution into a single administrative channel. This lack of examiner diversity means that the company's patent prospects are tied to the findings of 1 individual. For the practitioner, the presence of 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units simplifies the management of the portfolio by providing a single point of contact and a unified technical context.
NGUYEN, KHIEM D is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since NGUYEN, KHIEM D is the only examiner assigned to the portfolio, the outcome of the 1 pending office action is entirely dependent on this individual's review. Practitioners should prioritize a clear dialogue with NGUYEN, KHIEM D to address the specific issues raised in the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, KHIEM D | 1 | 85.8% | +12.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722752 | MICRO SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURING METHOD | NGUYEN, KHIEM D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722752 | MICRO SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURING METHOD | NGUYEN, KHIEM D | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722752 | MICRO SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURING METHOD | NGUYEN, KHIEM D | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial