Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc. is currently managing 5 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 5 actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is being handled by a different individual. This distribution is also reflected in the 5 distinct art units involved in the company's prosecution. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner handles 1 of the company's 5 pending office actions.

The presence of 5 distinct art units indicates that the company's innovations in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics are being evaluated across a wide range of technical classifications. This variety in examiners and art units provides the company with a broad range of feedback from the patent office. The prosecution strategy must account for the specific requirements of all 5 art units to successfully resolve the 5 pending office actions. This level of examiner diversity provides the company with a wide range of perspectives on its technical claims. Practitioners should monitor the 5 pending office actions for any conflicting requirements between the 5 art units. The distribution of 5 actions across 5 examiners suggests a strategy that avoids over-reliance on any single patent office contact. The company's focus on Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics is currently split between these 5 active prosecution paths.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 1 7.9% +50.0%
DEVITO, ALEX T 1 72.2% +12.2%
LINHARDT, LAURA E 1 68.6% +21.9%
PLAYER, ROBERT AUSTIN 1 13.6% +34.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18290479 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING TAMPERING OF BREATH SAMPLE MEASUREMENTS MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 49d overdue
17868250 BREATH TEST SYSTEM DEVITO, ALEX T 11d overdue
17621862 MULTI WAVELENGTH BREATH ANALYZING SYSTEM AND METHOD PLAYER, ROBERT AUSTIN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18290479 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING TAMPERING OF BREATH SAMPLE MEASUREMENTS MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 49d overdue
17868250 BREATH TEST SYSTEM DEVITO, ALEX T 11d overdue
17623776 COMBINED VEHICLE MOUNTED BREATH ANALYZING AND HVAC SYSTEM AND METHOD LINHARDT, LAURA E 19d
17621862 MULTI WAVELENGTH BREATH ANALYZING SYSTEM AND METHOD PLAYER, ROBERT AUSTIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1
2855 1
3663 1
1686 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18290479 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING TAMPERING OF BREATH SAMPLE MEASUREMENTS MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 3791 §102§103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Nov 14, 2023
17868250 BREATH TEST SYSTEM DEVITO, ALEX T 2855 §103§112 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2022
17623776 COMBINED VEHICLE MOUNTED BREATH ANALYZING AND HVAC SYSTEM AND METHOD LINHARDT, LAURA E 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Dec 29, 2021
17621862 MULTI WAVELENGTH BREATH ANALYZING SYSTEM AND METHOD PLAYER, ROBERT AUSTIN 1686 §101§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Dec 22, 2021

Managing Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc. have?

Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc. applications?

Erin Kathleen Mccormack has the most, with 1 of Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month