Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Azul Energy Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Azul Energy Inc. is currently prosecuting 2 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio exhibits a distributed structure, as these matters are handled by 2 distinct examiners. Furthermore, the applications are situated in 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's innovations span different technical sub-sectors within the biotechnology field.

HOU, FRANK S is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for 1 of the total 2 pending office actions, the company's prosecution success is not reliant on a single individual. This 1 to 2 ratio between the busiest examiner's workload and the total pending actions indicates a balanced distribution of legal matters across the patent office's personnel.

For a patent practitioner, the presence of 2 distinct art units requires a strategy that accounts for different examination cultures. Since 2 distinct examiners are involved, the practitioner must prepare for two potentially different sets of objections and timelines. The influence of HOU, FRANK S is limited to 1 busiest examiner pending office action, meaning that the other pending matter will be decided independently by a different examiner in a separate art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZHANG, KELING NMN 1 66.8% +17.6%
HOU, FRANK S 1 68.3% +34.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18001517 METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF, CATALYST COMPRISING METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, LIQUID COMPOSITION OR ELECTRODE CONTAINING CATALYST, AND AIR BATTERY OR FUEL CELL EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRODE HOU, FRANK S 7d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18001517 METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF, CATALYST COMPRISING METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, LIQUID COMPOSITION OR ELECTRODE CONTAINING CATALYST, AND AIR BATTERY OR FUEL CELL EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRODE HOU, FRANK S 7d
18001513 OXYGEN REDUCTION CATALYST AND SELECTION METHOD THEREOF, LIQUID COMPOSITION OR ELECTRODE CONTAINING OXYGEN REDUCTION CATALYST, AND AIR BATTERY OR FUEL CELL PROVIDED WITH ELECTRODE ZHANG, KELING NMN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1732 1
1692 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18001513 OXYGEN REDUCTION CATALYST AND SELECTION METHOD THEREOF, LIQUID COMPOSITION OR ELECTRODE CONTAINING OXYGEN REDUCTION CATALYST, AND AIR BATTERY OR FUEL CELL PROVIDED WITH ELECTRODE ZHANG, KELING NMN 1732 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 12, 2022
18001517 METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF, CATALYST COMPRISING METAL COMPLEX OR ADDUCT THEREOF AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, LIQUID COMPOSITION OR ELECTRODE CONTAINING CATALYST, AND AIR BATTERY OR FUEL CELL EQUIPPED WITH ELECTRODE HOU, FRANK S 1692 §102§112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Dec 12, 2022

Managing Azul Energy Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month