Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Bank of Montreal

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bank of Montreal has 4 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, suggesting some overlap in the technical classifications of its filings. The portfolio involves 4 distinct examiners, which means that every pending action is currently being reviewed by a different person.

HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. Because this 1 action is the maximum handled by any individual, the pending office actions are spread as widely as possible across the examiners. This distribution requires the applicant to manage unique examiner relationships simultaneously across the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 1 55.5% +23.6%
ROBINSON, GRETA LEE 1 80.5% +17.0%
KANAAN, TONY P 1 28.7% +27.9%
BASOM, BLAINE T 1 43.2% +20.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18923496 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA STORAGE AND PROCESSING ROBINSON, GRETA LEE —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19208206 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING MODELS BASED ON METADATA HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE —
18819888 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR ELECTRONIC CALENDAR PAYMENTS KANAAN, TONY P —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18218993 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING LOADING OF CONTENT ON USER INTERFACE BASOM, BLAINE T 49d overdue
19208206 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING MODELS BASED ON METADATA HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE —
18923496 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA STORAGE AND PROCESSING ROBINSON, GRETA LEE —
18819888 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR ELECTRONIC CALENDAR PAYMENTS KANAAN, TONY P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2163 1
3696 1
2141 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19208206 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING MODELS BASED ON METADATA HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE — §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2025
18923496 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA STORAGE AND PROCESSING ROBINSON, GRETA LEE 2163 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 22, 2024
18819888 SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR ELECTRONIC CALENDAR PAYMENTS KANAAN, TONY P 3696 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 29, 2024
18218993 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING LOADING OF CONTENT ON USER INTERFACE BASOM, BLAINE T 2141 §103DP Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Jul 06, 2023

Managing Bank of Montreal's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month